At the hematological level, all patients with low LMR presented lymphopenia, with a highly significant difference compared to those with high LMR (p < 0.001).
Excerpts
Statistical analysis was done using unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t-test or two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction as appropriate and defined as significant (* p<0.05), very significant (** p<0.01) and extremely significant (***, p<0.001).
Significant differences between data sets were marked with * (low significant, p < 0.05); ** (medium significant, p < 0.01); *** (highly significant, p < 0.001).
The variability in diversity between study years was highly significant (P < 0.001).
All pairwise comparisons among morphotypes from different localities resulted in a highly significant ( P < 0.001) genetic differentiation, with F ST values ranging from 0.971 (Cíes SU vs Arealonga RB) to 0.191 (Cíes SU vs Ons SU).
The overall correlation was highly significant ( r = 0.904, p <0.001, Fig 3 ).
A Fisher’s exact test confirmed a highly significant association between stimulus type and sentence production ( p < .001, OR = 143.75), demonstrating that the target stimuli successfully and reliably elicited subjective motion sentences compared to controls.
Notably, the most robust mediation effect is observed in the SNW → PBC → PO pathway, supported by highly significant constituent paths (SNW → PBC: p < 0.001; PBC → PO: p = 0.002).
MRT x trial interaction was extremely significant (P<0.001).
The treatment effect was highly significant for the 0.25% UC781 in vivo treated biopsies exposed ex vivo to 10 4 TCID 50 virus ( p<0.001 ).
Additionally, it showed excellent sampling adequacy, with a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.94, and the Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 = 3713.26, df = 276, p < 0.001), indicating strong evidence of construct validity and relationships among the variables assessed.
Composite case-management performance and testing rates The composite performance, defined as patient tested for malaria and treated with AL if the test result was positive or not treated for malaria if the result was negative, improved significantly by 34.2%; from 15.7% at the baseline to 49.9% at the last follow-up survey (p<0.001) with an increasing trend across all survey rounds (p<0.001) ( Figure 4 ).
The increase in MT ONH , MT PPR and OPP was highly significant (p < 0.001 each).
This reveals a highly significant difference between the Sr/Ca-ratio means (p<0.001) of the gladiators and the NG inhabitants ( Table 5 ).
Thus, the difference in the number of mice with retinal degeneration between NaIO 3 -treated αB crystallin knockout mice and NaIO 3 -treated wild type mice was highly significant (P<0.001).
A pairwise categorical comparison also revealed highly significant differences between SS and DES (P<0.001) and between SS and controls (P<0.001), but not for DES compared to controls for all three autoantibodies (P = 0.21, 0.32 and 0.10 respectively).
The combined effect of altitude, mountain range, and selected soil chemical properties explained 27.8% of the total microfaunal compositional variation and was highly significant ( F = 3.0, P = 0.001).
All regressions for mass-at-age of the neonate pups were highly significant (P<0.001) for each sex and cohort, providing reasonable estimations of mass at birth ( Figure 2 ).
The risk-adjusted multivariate Poisson regression model also indicated that patients' preferred location was a highly significant predictor for family global satisfaction (p = 0.001; Table 3 ).
The statistical analyses yielded general highly significant differences ( P ≤ 0.001) among compounds and their concentrations and, with the exception A . retroflexus root biomass and D . sanguinalis shoot biomass, significant inter-subject effects (compound × concentration) were also observed.
The season effect on agdw was significant (P < 0.05) and the [CO 2 ] effect was highly significant (P < 0.001).
There was a highly significant relationship between the average score of clinical competence and the participant’s age, sex, level of education, and years of clinical work experience ( P <0.001).
The three loci pairs had highly significant (P<0.001) LD values.
This showed highly significant effects (p<0.001) from infiltration mixture and leaf age (upper vs lower leaf).
Compared to the control group, the mCNV group showed significant differences in gender (p < 0.05), very significant differences in hypertension (p < 0.01), and highly significant differences in age, axial length, and refractive power (p < 0.001).