Ethanol (10 mM), a known inducer of CYP2E1 shows highly significant (p<0.001) increase the NDMA-d activity ( Figure 7 ).
Excerpts
As expected, there was a highly significant correlation between the sample size of cichlid individuals ( Table 1 ) and “Sum” ( Table 5 ) (Spearman's ρ = 0.972, P <0.001).
The risk-adjusted multivariate Poisson regression model also indicated that patients' preferred location was a highly significant predictor for family global satisfaction (p = 0.001; Table 3 ).
Settings for both observers revealed a highly significant main effect of the adapt condition on the image appearance (S1 F(2,45)=29.5, p<.001; S2 F(2,45)=58.3, p<.001).
It is remarkable that the expression of BMP-2 in the PLLA group reached a highly significant maximum after 8 weeks (p≤0.001) before decreasing again towards the end of the observation period ( Fig. 8b ).
Two-way ANOVA of ABR and DPOAE thresholds returned highly significant exposure and time effects ( p < 0 . 001 ).
The entire model had an adjusted R 2 of 0.79; 0.64 of the variance was explained by the first axis, and 0.14 of the variance was explained by the second axis, with both of these values highly significant (p<0.001, 999 permutations).
While, the levels of sorbitol were decreased with curcumin, the reduction was highly significant (p<0.001) with nanocurcumin ( Table 2 ).
Our study showed that flooding has a highly significant effect ( P <0.001) on AMF diversity (based on phylotype richness, Shannon's index and phylotype composition), and the effects are dependent on the degree of flooding.
As a summary, we show in Figure 2 highly significant GO terms (p-value <0.001) in at least one treatment, as well as the significant levels for the other treatments.
Again, the difference was highly significant ( P <0.001).
Although resistance between each year was not significantly different, when comparing the resistant rate between 2009 and 2014 it was highly significant (p = 0.001) with a 15.5% difference ( Fig 2 ). gyr A Mutations Mutations in levofloxacin resistant strains were present in quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) at positions 87 and 91.
The survival of EP patients was better than EPC patients but did not reach statistical significance and, in the Cox multivariate analysis only age had statistically significant effect (HR 1.061, 95% CI 1.026–1.099, p < 0.001).
The difference between the two lbe haplotype groups was highly significant (F st = 0.84; K st = 0.75; P <0.001).
“**” indicates a highly significant ( P <0.001) difference from controls.
majoris is known to decrease with age [42] , and age had a highly significant effect also in the present analysis (GLM (bird age) F 1,301 = 19.1, p<0.001, Figure 1 ).
Furthermore, in a two-factor ANOVA, the interaction of carcass rates with capture method and period was highly significant (F 2,306 = 227.23, MSE = 0.109, p < 0.001), as mean carcass rates increased for both trap and shotgun over the Early and Pre-ban periods, but only increased for shotgun Post-ban ( S1 Fig ).
The variable ‘network size’ is highly significant and positive (p<0.001), which shows that building larger networks is not a successful strategy and at the same time supports our assumption that the right network configuration is essential for success.
All ANOVA tests were highly significant ( p < 0.001, see Table 3 ).
Highly significant differences (p<0.001***) were observed in prevalence of four pNLGS (N130, N295, N392 and N448) between South Africa and India, having most disease burden associated with subtype C.
Chi-squared analysis revealed a highly significant difference in observed mortality compared with expected values between the control and burial groups (χ 2 = 66.7, df = 1, p<0.001), therefore controls were omitted from further analysis regarding burial mortality.
Results were interpreted as highly significant*** (p<0.001), significant** (p<0.01), weakly significant* (p<0.05) or not significant ns (p>0.05).
Randomization trials show that this difference is highly significant (p<0.001) despite the relatively small number of available functionally annotated sites.
A highly significant association was observed when comparing measurements across all strains ( p <0.001) and there was no correlation with weight and CCT, as these were eliminated as potential covariates.
The voluntary compliance rate of hunters who received an ammunition voucher was 27.7% higher than hunters who did not receive a voucher; a difference that is strongly statistically and practically significant ( t 915 = 16.73, p < .001; Cohen’s d = 1.106).