As with the outdoor concentrations, we found highly significant differences in between-days comparison using Kruskall-Wallis test (p<0.001) ( Fig 3 ).
Excerpts
Acoustic startle response measured in another cohort of mice (9 controls and 10 mutants aged 9 weeks) showed an altered curve: there was a highly significant interaction between genotype and startle pulse intensity (F (7,11) = 4.153, p<0.001), and Bonferroni posthoc tests revealed a significantly lower response of mutants at maximum dB (p<0.01, Fig. 2F ).
The differences among the observers in frequency of opportunities to witness HH performances were highly significant; P<0.001.
Only the main effect of distractor was highly significant (F(4,72) = 113.72, P<0.001, η p 2 = 0.863), with expected increases in response accuracy as the number of distractors between target letters increased from zero to four.
‘n.s’, ‘*’, ‘**’, and ‘***’ are non-significant (p>0.05), significant (0.01<p<0.05), very significant (0.001<p<0.01) and highly significant (p<0.001) difference in means, respectively, based on permutation tests.
P values were considered as significant (*) if p<0.05, as very significant (**) if p<0.01 and as extremely significant (***) if p<0.001.
An older age was highly significant associated with the presence of advanced fibrosis (p<0.001).
The multiple regression coefficient, R , from the fits to each finger was highly significant (multiple R ’s >.90, p <.001) as were each of the standardized beta coefficients for each tempo ( p ’s <.001; the only exception was finger 3′s wrist rotation at tempo 9.6 tones per second with a p -value of 0.367).
For Germany as a whole, the respective dummy variable is highly significant (1.094 percentage points; p < .001).
BMI was highest in Stage 3 (30.73 ± 0.24) and lowest in Stage 0 (21.52 ± 0.09), with a significant trend across stages ( P < 0.001).
The results of our ANOVA comparing M 1-2 RFI values among paromomyid species came out highly significant (p <0.001).
The comparison of WHO patient care indicators between APTS and Non-APTS facilities related to the average dispensing time, percentage of drugs actually dispensed and percentage of drugs adequately labeled, showed highly significant differences (p<0.001) ( Table 3 ).
The two-fold higher resistance to phosmet of females compared with males was highly significant (relative female:male potency = 1.99, t-value = 11.3, p-value < 0.001).
Matrix of pairwise correlations showed a relative decrease of the partial r only between He and Na but it remained highly significant ( r = 0.57; p<0.001).
All simple main effects were highly significant (of the 12 tests, smallest F (2,43) = 51.3, p <.001).
However, in the Netherlands a very strong and highly significant opposite effect was present, i.e. much more females than males thought women are better due to childcare (χ2(1) = 11.6, p < .001, V = .477).
Highly significant regression patterns were recorded for total parasitoid or specialist parasitoid species richness and parasitism rate were observed (F 1,44 = 15.304, p<0.001; F 1,44 = 17.143, p<0.001).
There were significant differences in immune cell subpopulations between the two groups, particularly in the following aspects: first, the differences among B cells memory, Macrophages M0, and CD4 naive T cells were extremely significant ( P < 0.001).
An increasing trend in age was observed across the BUCR categories (63.52 ± 14.42 vs. 68.70 ± 14.15 vs. 73.48 ± 12.48 years; P < 0.001), along with a progressively greater proportion of male patients (38.56% vs. 42.54% vs. 62.35%; P < 0.001).
Chi-squared analysis revealed a highly significant difference in observed mortality compared with expected values between the control and burial groups (χ 2 = 66.7, df = 1, p<0.001), therefore controls were omitted from further analysis regarding burial mortality.
These differences were highly significant (P<0.001, one-tailed Student’s t-test).
Pasture type had a highly significant effect on live-weight gain (s.e.d. = 0.08 kg d −1 ; P <0.001), which was just over 1 kg d −1 when grazing the lowland ryegrass sward, but less than 0.35 kg d −1 when grazing the hill sward ( Fig. 1 ).
The model was highly significant in that it predicted documented panther locations statistically better ( p < 0.001) than 1,000 random models, which means that its accuracy was significantly higher than what would be expected by chance alone.
At Geeveston, the mean DBH of the long-distance crosses was only marginally (at the 5% significance level) greater than the mid-parent value by age 13 years, but at Weilangta highly significant ( P ≤0.001) heterosis was evident by age 9 years ( Table 1 ).
AMOVA results for overall population genetic structure within and among the populations were highly significant ( p < 0.001), except for ND1 gene results.