The Wald test is highly significant, showing that positive information has a weaker effect on placing trust than negative information has on not placing trust (χ 2 = 15.27; p < 0.001).
Excerpts
CDAI and HBI scores significantly decreased compared to baseline after anti-TNF-α infusion at all time points ( Table 3 ), and the association between these two measures over time was highly significant (B = 18.45, p<0.001).
The probability of a blenny switching to another species after being punished varied between 14.1%–71.4%, yielding overall highly significant differences between individuals (Chi 2 test, n = 560 observations on 6 blennies, Chi 2 = 227.8, df = 5, p<0.001, fig. 3 ).
In terms of age, the SOCQ-general, ‘friends’ and ‘work/studies’ showed a decreasing trend (p<0.001), ‘acquaintances’ showed an increasing trend (p<0.001), and ‘family’ did not show differences among age groups (p = 0.333). ‘Social satisfaction’, measured by the VAS, did not show significant changes either by sex (p = 0.217) or by age (p = 0.262).
All neurocognitive measures from the LNS (forward and re-order), CVLT-II (immediate and delayed recall), and WCST-64 (perseverative responses and categories completed) revealed robust and highly significant differences (d = 0.60 to d = 1.71, p<0.001) between the SZ and NCS groups.
Furthermore, Egger’s test statistics confirmed the presence of marginally significant publication bias at a P-value < 0.001 ( Table 4 ). 3.5.
naso (grouped according to the SAMOVA test) was highly significant (Φ ST = 0.91, P < 0.001), while the pairwise Φ ST values among the three major clusters varied from 0.83 to 0.92 ( Fig 3 , S3 Table ).
Statistical analysis revealed that the effect of the dose was highly significant ( p <0.001).
The distance-based AMOVA analysis revealed genetic variance among and within the populations were highly significant (P<0.001) and the variation within subgroups (89%) was significantly higher than that among subgroups (11%) ( Table 4 ).
DMR analysis did not find genome-wide significant regions, however 359 nominally significant candidate regions were identified, of which the top 10 regions had a nominal p-value <1.0 x 10 −3 ( S3 Table ).
Molecular Interactions Ingenuity based pathway analysis revealed highly significant overlap with 92 canonical pathways with p<0.001 and a total of 196 canonical pathways p<0.05.
Group means were underestimated at each interval (p < 0.0001), and there was a significant trend for underproduction to decrease as the interval lengthened (p < 0.001; ratios of 0.73, 0.76, 0.81, 0.85, and 0.88 respectively for 1, 3, 6, 12 and 15 sec).
The model demonstrated a highly significant association of both past (B = -1.286; P = <0.0001) and current non-vegetarian food habit (B = -0.667; P = 0.001) in the advancement of AMD pathology ( Table 6 ).
This value has been classified as a substantial agreement [ 35 ] and is highly significant (p<0.001).
Randomization trials show that this difference is highly significant (p<0.001) despite the relatively small number of available functionally annotated sites.
This showed highly significant effects (p<0.001) from infiltration mixture and leaf age (upper vs lower leaf).
That Linear Model was highly significant (F 10,213 = 5.98, p<0.001, R 2 = 0.18).
Our tabulated prediction accuracy (averaged over 39 subjects completing the experiment) over the full stimulus set (see Table 1 ) was highly significant for both valence (p < .001; signed rank; α = .05; h 0 : μ = .5) and arousal (p < .001; signed rank; α = .05; h 0 : μ = .5).
For the non-small cell lesions that comprised a majority of the cancer patients, there was a highly significant (P<0.001) increase in the value of the LEBS marker.
A paired-sample t-test comparing N1 and MMNm latencies of the left (mean latencies of all subjects: MMNm peak: 164.5 ms, N1 peak: 124.0 ms) and right (MMNm peak: 165.6 ms, N1 peak: 125.6 ms) hemisphere in the perceptual condition reveal a highly significant difference between the latencies of those two components [left hemisphere: t (25) = 5.563, p <.001, right hemisphere: t (25) = 7.132, p <.001], showing that the MMNm peaks are not intermixed with the N1 peaks.
Comparisons between the different treatment groups were analyzed via one-way ANOVA and the least significant difference (LSD), and differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 * and highly significant at p < 0.001.
This tendency was reflected in a highly significant Age by Modality interaction (Wald χ 2 = 17.1, df = 2, p < .001) ) based on the GEE test of model effects, reflecting the fact that the difference between the rate of Conventional vocalizations and gestures grew dramatically from 13 to 20 months.
The combined effect of altitude, mountain range, and selected soil chemical properties explained 27.8% of the total microfaunal compositional variation and was highly significant ( F = 3.0, P = 0.001).
There was a highly significant association between age and stereo class on both tests (p<0.001, χ 2 -squared test).
The two discriminating functions for this model were highly significant (P<0.001).