Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantP<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For incident CAD, the associated effect of rs4977574 was found to be highly significant in never-smokers (HR 1.26 per risk allele; 95% CI 1.13–1.40; P<0.001) and former smokers (HR = 1.20 per risk allele; 95% CI 1.08–1.32; P<0.001), whereas this associated effect was attenuated and not significant in current smokers (HR = 1.05 per risk allele; 95% CI 0.95–1.16; P = 0.326) ( Table 3 , Figure 2 ).
highly significantp = .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A similar pattern of results was found for the measure of avoidance latency, with a highly significant two-way interaction, F (12,164) = 3.0, p = .001, reflecting poorer acquisition curves in the 50 and 100 Hz groups relative to the 20 Hz and no stimulation groups ( Figure 2 , middle panel).
an increasing trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
The association between PLR, NLR, MLR, SII and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality The Kaplan–Meier curve revealed an increasing trend in long-term all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality rates with higher levels of PLR, NLR, MLR, and SII ( P < 0.001, Fig 3 – 4 ).
highly significantp <.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the 100-item versions, highly significant inversion effects were evident on both our new tasks: Emotion-matching (upright: M = 77.59, SD = 7.64; inverted: M = 68.28, SD = 6.88; t (96) = 4.75, p <.001) and Emotion-labelling (upright: M = 83.10, SD = 6.87; inverted: M = 67.50, SD = 9.84; t (96) = 7.99, p <.001).
a notable trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
The Kaplan-Meier survival curves depicted in Fig 2 show a notable trend: participants diagnosed with either CKD or PAD had higher all-cause mortality and CCD mortality than participants without the corresponding two diseases (all P < 0.001).
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results are highly significant for the entire shape ( F = 55.22; df = 1, 98; p < .001), the haft shape ( F = 26.95; df = 1, 98; p < .001), and the blade shape ( F = 69.67; df = 1, 98; p < .001), and we confidently reject the null hypothesis of “no allometry” (full results in S2 Table 1 in S2 Table ).