Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The effects of the study drugs on gut microbiome β-diversity at the OTU level were first tested statistically using a two-way NPMANOVA and the results revealed highly significant main effects for drug (F 4,65 = 3.35; p = 0.0001) and time (F 2,65 = 8.43, p = 0.0001), as well as a significant interaction (F 8,65 = 1.77, p = 0.0001).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant positive relationship between year and the proportion of investments made as easements measured both in acres and in dollars ( Fig. 1 ; r 2 = 0.64, p<0.0001; r 2 = 0.54, p<0.0001, respectively).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Response surface equations for peak sound pressure level (SPL peak) and effective sound pressure level (RMS) were constructed by a quadratic polynomial regression model with linear, interaction and quadratic terms, which was verified by analysis of variance (ANOVA) to be highly significant (p < 0.0001), as shown in equations (15) and (16) .
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Construct validity of the 31-item Likert scale was supported by an overall Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy (MSA) value of 0.853 (range 0.766 to 0.902), along with a highly significant Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity (P < 0.0001), indicating that the data were suitable for factor analysis ( Table 3 ).
highly significantP< 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The FT-B1 alleles showed highly significant differences in heading time ( P< 0.0001) within both alleles of FT-A1 , but the differences between the adjusted means of the FT-B1 alleles were 34% larger in the lines homozygous for the mutant ft-A1 allele (25.0 day delay in flowering) than in the lines homozygous or heterozygous for the wild type FT-A1 allele (18.6 day delay).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When tumor burden (cell number) was plotted against serum S100A6 protein concentration in these animals, results indicated a highly significant correlation (r = 0.79, p<0.0001); serum S100A6 concentration was greater as the tumor burden increased over time for animals given SKOV-3-Luc ( Figure 6C ).