Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Soil biological characteristics The analysis of variance using a GLMM showed highly significant differences (P <0.0001) for the abundance of macroinvertebrate orders between distance to the crown of the tree (below or outside) (29.26 ± 2.22 and 22.66 ± 1.77 below and outside of crown, respectively, Fig 1 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Age is also highly significant (younger p < 0.0001 in univariate analysis), as is the prevalence of socioeconomic disadvantage in the local area where respondents live (less disadvantage p = 0.0006 in univariate analysis), but both become non-significant in multivariate analysis, i.e. when analysed in the context of the other independent variables.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Multiple linear regression analysis showed, in both genders, a highly significant relationship between z-scores differences (ECSC vs GLI-2017) and age (as in the “control” group) (p < 0.0001, in both genders), the decrease in D LCO severity (p < 0.0001, in both genders) and the interaction between age and severity (p < 0.0001 in both genders).
highly significantp <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A scatter plot of PIP expression versus that of the PIP-activated metagene across 557 BCa tumors revealed a highly significant positive correlation (r 2 = 0.4; p <0.0001), suggesting that in a clinical setting, PIP most likely regulates genes comprising the PIP-activated metagene as defined in the T47D/shPIP dox culture system ( Figure 2B ).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant positive relationship between year and the proportion of investments made as easements measured both in acres and in dollars ( Fig. 1 ; r 2 = 0.64, p<0.0001; r 2 = 0.54, p<0.0001, respectively).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As a cross-check, calculated (via DIC and TA) and directly measured pH values were compared and showed a highly significant correlation and no outliers (pH (total scale) = 0.9176 pH (NBS) +0.5453; r 2 = 0.99; p<0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There is no consensus on how p-values should be estimated for linear mixed models, but following the t-statistics obtained from using the Satterthwaite’s method, the effect of the participant’s role (whether proposer or recipient) was highly significant (p < 0.0001) whereas the effect of the depression diagnosis and the role:depression interaction were not.