In contrast, less blood loss, shorter hospitalization time and less operative transfusion rate in laparoscopic liver resection were all highly significant (P<0.00001–0.0008).
Excerpts
did not reach statistical significanceP -value <0.00001
However, after correction for multiple testing, the association did not reach statistical significance (an interaction term P -value <0.00001 was considered statistically significant after correction for the number of interactions tested [23×23 = 529; 0.05/529 = 9.5 10 −5 ].
This comparison clearly demonstrated that CSC-affected eyes had SFCT which was ~145 μm (34%) bigger compared to normal control’ eyes (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 145.03, 95% confidence interval (CI), 121.33–168.73) and that this difference was highly significant (P<0.00001), with heterogeneity identified.
The Fst values were relatively high and reached highly significant levels (p < 10 −5 ) between populations from Tak (all collection periods) and Yala-Narathiwat (21.75%), and between Ubon Ratchathani and Yala-Narathiwat (19.44%), implying genetic differentiation or limited gene flow between these endemic areas.
Genetic structure was highly structured among these groups of populations (AMOVA; permutation tests highly significant, P <0.00001), meaning that most of the genetic variability was partitioned among groups (77.28%), and only a small proportion of the variability was partitioned among populations within groups (14.71%) or within populations (8.003%).
However, several nominally significant (p<1.00E-05) variants were identified ( Table 2 ).
These results were highly significant (p = 0.00001).
The combined effect SMD was 2.64 (95% CI: 2.38, 2.90), indicating a highly significant difference (P < 0.00001).
All pair-wise comparisons showed highly significant levels of population genetic differentiation (P<10 -5 , Table S2 ).
Neurophysiologic Analysis Not surprisingly, in keeping with prior studies (e.g., 28 , 55 , 57 ), on average, there was a highly significant effect of odorant on both the spatial patterns of different odorants (F [4, 430] = 128.28; P < 0.00001) and the response magnitude (F [4, 437] = 117.26; P < 0.00001).
However, direct effect was highly significant (ANOVA, F (2,65) = 41.47, P < 0.00001).
The increments in luciferase activity produced by the addition of increasing amounts of human rMCP-1 to antigen stimulated cells were significant for the allele 1G (ANOVA F = 10.23, p = 0.005) and highly significant for the allele 2G (ANOVA F = 172.3, p <0.00001).
As was the case with secretion, the differences in cell retention for wild-type and mutant versions of Wnt1 are highly significant (p<1×10 −5 ).
Highly significant F ST -values between species (0.2957, P<0.00001) confirmed enough resolution for species discrimination.
Table 3 reports the final hierarchical AMOVA confirming that the northern populations (grouped to be compared with the other populations) were strongly differentiated from those of central Italy with high and highly significant fixation index (Φ CT = 0.666, p<0.00001).
Inter-rater reliability was highly significant (Cohen's κ = 0.62; Z = 19.1; P << 0.00001; number of errors = 90).
The similarity in prognostic group assignment was highly significant ( p <10 −5 by Chi-square test).
All the variables included in the model were highly significant at a p<0.00001 ( Table 2 ).
Seventy markers were excluded from the following analysis, as they showed highly significant departure from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (P<10 −5 ), obtaining 5,192 markers for the following analysis.
The overall model was highly significant (chi 2 = 108.2, df = 2, p<0.00001).
During the Conditioning phase, highly significant (p<0.00001) main group and training day effects were observed and those were sustained over the entire period of Conditioning.
These 27 Arabidopsis proteins ( Table 1 ) represent a highly significant (p<1e −5 ) enrichment for the gene ontology GO categories of phosphorus metabolic processes, protein metabolic process, cellular macromolecular metabolic process and biopolymer metabolic process.
However, the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity between the two data is highly significant, using the two-sided t -test with p-value <10 −5 .
Testing for heterogeneity showed a highly significant result (p<0.00001) and high inconsistency (I 2 = 94%).
The regression model ( Table 4 ) provided a highly significant fit for the Executive Function index; the proportion of variance explained was 0.6 (F = 19.8, p<0.00001).