However, when the animals reached 16 weeks of age, a strong trend towards LV cavity dilation was observed in the smLrp1 -/- mice in comparison to the 12-week old mice ( P < 0.01) and to their age matched smLrp1 +/+ littermates ( P < 0.05).
Excerpts
Highly significant group effect was found on the affective thresholds (F(1,39) = 7.473, p<0.01) whereby affective thresholds were significantly lower in the MDD compared to the HC group.
A highly significant correlation was observed between GC 1 % with GC 2 % (r = 0.551, p < 0.01 ), GC 3 % (r = 0.699, p < 0.01 ), and GC 2 % with GC 3 % (r = 0.490, p < 0.01 ).
The phase average wavelength and MoCA scores were negatively correlated in 13 brain regions (81.3% of the total, P < 0.05), and 10 of them were highly significant ( P < 0.01), indicating that the lower the cognitive score, the longer the wavelength.
When we compared invasive rat activity in pre- and post-COVID lockdown conditions, we found the decrease in Rattus activity to be highly significant (p < 0.01).
All models reported here are highly significant (p<0.01), and the explained variance is between 69% and 83%.
Inhibition of protein catabolism, possibly associated with increased protein synthesis, was quite significant (p>0.01) in D2 conditions, likely due to the action of insulin triggered by high glucose levels.
Ifitm3 -/- mice showed highly significant weight loss on days six and seven pi compared to wild type littermates (p < 0.01) ( Figure 6A ).
The Joint F-statistics and Wald statistics were highly significant (p<0.01), which proves that the model was statistically significant.
For all statistical analyses done in this paper, p < 0.001 is defined as highly significant, 0.01 > p > 0.001 is defined as moderately significant, and 0.05 > p > 0.01 is defined as weakly significant.
Highly significant correlations existed among height, age and DBH of the trees along both altitudinal gradients ( Fig. 4 ), with coefficients from 0.8–0.95 (p<0.01).
Interestingly, the PCV2-positive rate was significantly higher in the PPV7-positive samples than in the non-PPV7 samples, and the difference was extremely significant (P<0.01).
S5 ) and was highly significant overall (P<0.01, Table S4 ).
The difference in DARPP32 staining intensity between HOM and HET mice was statistically highly significant (Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.01).
In HC and Mod/Sev, but not the MA subjects, stimulation of PBECs with EGF enhanced the chemotactic activity when compared to basal-CM (p = 0.021 in HC, 0.093 in MA and 0.010 in Mod/Sev asthma, Table S1); the EGF-CM activity was related to clinical asthma severity as shown by an increasing trend (linear contrast test p = 0.010) ( Figure 2A ).
One-way ANOVA of the virus accumulation in the control and treatment groups were highly significant, ( P <0.01) for DWV ( F = 11.83, df = 23 P = 0.00234; Cohen’s d = 1.473107, large effect size), and ( P <0.001) for VDV-1 ( F = 17.95, df = 23.
The difference between both the probability and subtraction model with four CPGs and the experimental values in the mean and median IPIs, and the IPI standard deviation was highly significant (P<0.01, Kruskal-Wallis Test, followed by Dunn's Multiple Comparisons Test, Table 1 ).
In the statistical analyses, differences were classed as significant for values of p < 0.05, and highly significant for values of p < 0.01 and p < 0.001.
The mutant showed poorer siderophore activity than the WT ( Figs 4C ), the difference was highly significant (P < 0.01).
The sparsely and densely rakered morphs showed highly significant differences in these measures (t-test: P <0.01).
In the present study, the level of significance was set at ≤ 0.05 (highly significant: p-value ≤ 0.01) [ 21 ]. 3.
Difference between groups was considered highly significant when p≤0.01 and significant when p≤0.05.
Correlations were considered significant (*) at p < 0.05 (two-tailed) and highly significant (**) at p < 0.01 (two-tailed).
Indeed, the estimated coefficient on Index 2 is about 1.5 times that for girls and now highly significant statistically as well as economically (0.042 SDs per μg/m 3 vs 0.028 for girls, p -value < 0.01).
Criteria for retention were: 1) difference in mean plasma lipid concentration is highly significant (p<0.01) between patient and control groups; 2) changes in mean plasma lipid concentration is >2-fold (up or down); and 3) mean plasma lipid concentration is >10 nmol/μl.