Excerpts

A two-factorial ANOVA yielded no significant effect for the factor experiment (F = 1.13; P = 0.38) and a highly significant random effects factor subject (F = 11.35; P<0.001).

For bacteria, the linear regression model was highly significant in each region ( P <0.001, Fig. 2 ) except in Landes where it was just below the significance threshold of 5% ( P <0.02).

The difference in excess observed similarity between the groups is highly significant (p<0.001, rank test), which suggests that amino acid identity is a poor measure for estimating physicochemical similarity, and thus T cell cross-reactivity.

An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was run showing statistically highly significant effects for food quantity (p<0.001) and quality (p<0.001).

The CFTR mRNA expression was analyzed by qRT-PCR, and, as shown in Figure 5A , Caco-2/pRS26 cells shows a highly significant (p<0.001) decrease in the CFTR levels (0.58±0.03 a.u.; mean ± SE; n = 10) compared to control cells (0.99±0.06a.u., n = 10).

Mating System, Effective Density of Pollen Donors and Male Reproductive Variance In the study site, we found a highly significant difference between multilocus and single-locus outcrossing rates ( t m = 0.999 vs. t s = 0.856; Student’s t = 94.466, P <0.001), indicating that about 14% of matings occurred between genetically related plants.

Quantification of the biofilm biomass by crystal violet staining showed a highly significant difference in OD 585 between biofilms grown in the absence and presence of OPN (OD 585 = 1.0±0.30 SD without OPN and 0.26±0.06 SD with OPN; p<0.001).

A significant trend was found for changes between groups for t PTEF / t E ( Figure 3 ), which decreased with disease severity (p<0.001, Table 3 ).

Due to missing values of patients without a partner, this variable was adjusted by comparing its regression with the total model, which was highly significant (HR 2.66, 95% CI 2.14–3.31, p = 0.001).

Patients with heart failure also showed a trend toward higher risk at overall follow-up ( HR = 1.61 p < 0.001).

This effect is highly significant, chi 2 = 10.75, p = 0.001, and consistent with time pressure inducing more intuitive decision-making than time delay.

The ANOVA results demonstrated that the tests were highly significant, with P < 0.001.

Finally, the effect of genre on Normalized POS Entropy was also highly significant, H(2) = 111.96, p < .001.

A comparative analysis of the four clusters indicated a highly significant difference (df = 3, P < 0.001) among them for five of the six variables (soluble sugars: df = 3, Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 13.1, P = 0.004, Fig 4A ; insoluble sugars: df = 3, F = 13.1, P = 0.01, Fig 4B ; pH: df = 3, F = 17.7, P < 0.00001, Fig 4C ; Flavonoids: df = 3, F = 20.95, P < 0.00001, Fig 4D and Phenols: df = 3, F = 9.11, P < 0.001, Fig 4E ) that significantly described the clusters obtained.

A highly significant main effect of Time (F(1, 90) = 26.532, p < .001, ŋ p 2 = .371) showed a significant reduction in children’s acute cortisol after interventions.

However, highly significant differences were found ( p <0.001) between groups G 6 vs.

However, when each of these variables was introduced into the model alongside body weight, which itself remained highly significant (p<0.001), the relationships between HOMA-IR and both PA and %BF were essentially unchanged.

In Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, the difference in means turns out to be highly significant (z = 45.558, p<0.001), showing the overweight vignette to be rated consistently more negatively.

The root rot phenotype had a highly significant ( p < 0.001) correlation with leaf wilting ( r = 0.826) and plant mortality ( r = 0.982).

Fisher’s exact test based on the concatenated Cytb and CR datasets obtained a highly significant ( P <0.001) relationship between genetic variation sites and lineage.

Weight was used as a proxy for body size and showed a highly significant correlation with length (r = 0.98; p<0.001).

All of these correlations were highly significant ( p < .001).

Using this ranking, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)[ 34 ] of the nearest gene to each HIF-1 α binding site demonstrated a highly significant (p<0.001) association between HIF-1 α binding and positive, but not negative, regulation of these transcripts ( Fig 1E ).

In these two cases, the variation in transmission bias is supported by highly significant heterogeneity G -tests (multilocus genotype 45: G = 32.750, P <0.001; multilocus genotype 58: G = 27.534, P = 0.001).

Comparative statistical analysis of number and type of mutations in current and previous data The Poisson regression model showed a highly significant (p<0.001) relative increase of the TP53 mutation prevalence in p53 hotspot codons from the current clinical series, compared with IARC database results ( Table 3 ).