Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Panel regressions In panel regressions, WHO-estimated TB mortality declined around 1% faster in countries and years with ART coverage scale-up ( Table 1 , top), an effect that was highly significant (p<0.001) when considering TB mortality decline over years 1–3, 2–4 or 3–5 after onset of ART scale-up.
highly significantP<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Food Plant Preference 24 h after LCA Damage Determination of food plant preferences revealed a highly significant response that strongly depended on the different treatments applied ( Fig. 1B ; univariate ANOVA: F 4, 103 = 10.065, P<0.001), while colony identity did not affect the model (‘ant colony’ as random factor, univariate ANOVA: F 2, 103 = 0.315, P>0.05).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Regarding CSS, the survival differences were highly significant among all subgroups (P < 0.001), except for the difference between stage IIIB and IIIC diseases, which demonstrated a marginally less pronounced distinction (P = 0.021).
a significant trendp = 0.0010.0× alphagold
In this model, the second wave of COVID-19 showed a significant trend toward a reduced mean length of stay compared with the first wave (−0.57 days, p = 0.001), whereas the third wave was not statistically significant, indicating that the mean hospitalization duration was not influenced by this wave (Table 7). 2) Throughout the manuscript, the authors redundantly report the confidence level (95% CI) and the alpha level (5%) when describing statistical results.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Our GLM analyses of LR of individual males and females and numbers of local recruits they produced showed that number of fledglings produced by both sexes was a highly significant predictor of the number of both F1 (males, P < 0.001, df = 193; females, P < 0.001, df = 248, Fig 13A and 13C ) and F2 recruits (males, P < 0.001, df = 19; females P < 0.001, df = 248, Fig 13B and 13D ).
highly significantp <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found a highly significant effect of clinical group [F (1,63) = 12.892, p <0.001] and a significant effect of age group [F (1,63) = 5.988, p = 0.017] with no interaction between clinical group and age group [F (1,63) = 0.133, NS], indicating a similar deficit in visual activation in both children and adults with NF1.