A highly significant correlation was observed between the manipulability ratings provided by the BOSS and the action index obtained in the present experiment, Pearon's r = 0.71, p<.001.
Excerpts
The results of chi-square tests showed highly significant associations (p<0.001) of exposure to all types of mass media with background characteristics of Indian women.
In the case of π S , there were highly significant main effects of virus (F 1, 459 = 41.31; p <0.001) and of ORF (F 13, 459 = 14.07; p <0.001), but there was not a significant virus-by-ORF interaction (F 13, 459 = 1.35; n.s.).
We found a highly significant effect of ‘Text Displayed’ on ‘Text Produced’ (Pearson Chi-square, d.f. = 1, Deviance = 126.09, p<0.001).
A highly significant association was found between gender and occupation (p < 0.001); females were predominantly housewives, males were distributed mainly among self-employed individuals, students, farmers, and manual workers.
We next tested whether participant clusters were distributed differently across the studies, after excluding those non-responses, and found highly significant differences (Chi-squared test; P-value < 0.001) ( Fig 2B ).
We detected highly significant fits (p < 0.001) for weekly and monthly data with R 2 and MAPE values of 0.948, and 21.622% and 0.955 and 29.316%, respectively, whereas for the annual data, we detected significance at the p < 0.05 level, with a higher MAPE value (52.96%).
The recruitment was stopped early after a recommendation from the data and safety monitoring committee that was based on a highly significant difference between groups (p<0.001) in the incidence of the primary outcome favoring MV-PCI.
The model predicted 32% of the variance and was highly significant (R 2 = 0.32, P <0.001).
This model had little explanatory power and a poor fit, as is common for bivariate logistic regression (McFadden’s Pseudo R 2 0.039, AUC 0.697, and a highly significant Hoslem’s test p<0.001).
Trial number was always an informative predictor of response times that was retained in all stepwise model simplifications, and was a highly significant predictor of reduced capture times over successive slides in all models where the interaction between trial number and treatment were dropped (in all cases p<0.001).
The differences between the four frequencies were highly significant ( Χ 2 = 139.68, df = 3, p < 0.001), and so was the pairwise difference between the recommendations made for the Democratic and Republican parties ( z = 5.05, p < 0.001).
A two-way ANOSIM test confirmed that differences between survey period were highly significant (Global R: 0.764, P = 0.001) and all pairwise comparisons between periods were significant ( P <0.05).
When analyzed by question type, the difference in consistent accuracy remained highly significant for Type A questions (adjusted p < 0.001).
In the final 20% of the simulation (steps 64–80), DeepONet RL’s SEM band shows minimal overlap with Pure TD3’s, suggesting statistical significance ( p < 0.05), while LQR’s complete separation indicates a highly significant gap ( p < 0.001). 4.2.2 Spatio-temporal state consistency.
This association is highly significant (p-value < 0.001).
This is also supported by the observed statistically highly significant interaction term (p<0.001) between life event stress and the character trait optimism vs pessimism (line 325).
In the left superior parietal lobe (SPL), a marginally significant (at whole brain P <.001 uncorrected ) positive interaction for synaesthetes was found for the contrast of the collapsed synaesthesia CC and IC conditions, compared to the collapsed colour CC and IC conditions (see Table 3 ).
There was a significant trend over time towards a decreasing number of deaths due to CO-poisoning (R 2 = 0.49, p<0.001) ( Fig 3 ).
Pooled data from three independent experiments revealed highly significant inhibition (p<0.001) as measured by slope, max-min and AUC analysis ( Figure 4C-E ).
The GROUP×ARRAY SIZE interaction (F (2,90) = 2.92, p = 0.06) was marginally significant, and the main effect of ARRAY SIZE (F (2,90) = 120.23, p <0.001) and GROUP (F[ (1], [45) ] = 5.64, p = 0.02) was significant.
When considering population and R morphotype divisions, all metrical parameters of M 1 showed highly significant variation (p<0.001) between samples.
However, the analysis did show a highly significant (p<0.001) negative correlation between SerpinB2 and T-bet mRNA levels ( Fig. 3B ).
p < 0.05 was accepted as level of significance; *** very highly significant p < 0.001; ** highly significant p < 0.01; * significant p < 0.05; NS not significant for p > 0.05.
There was a highly significant difference in performance between the 4 dietary groups (F 1, 25 = 7.915, P<0.001), and a highly significant effect of time (F 6, 150 = 5.354, P<0.001) but no significant interaction was seen between diet and time (F 18, 150 = 0.789, NS) ( Fig. 1 A).