Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantP<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Variations in grain yield and grain plumpness Highly significant (P<0.001) yield differences were observed between the parents of the DH lines in five environments (MRC12, MRC13, RAC13, SWH12 and SWH13), while it was not significant in RAC12 ( Table 1 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
ANOVA on the size of angles separating each data point from the horizontal showed highly significant (p < 0.001) variation among the three technologies ( Table 2 ). rhAmp and KASP showed smaller angle compared to that of TaqMan, indicating better allelic discrimination between homozygous (Allele 11) and heterozygous (Allele 12) ( Table 3 ).
highly significantp<.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Similarly, for error rates a highly significant main effect of trial type has been revealed across the total sample (F (3,72) = 36.126, η 2 = .60, p<.001) and extreme groups (F (3,42) = 52.424, η 2 = .79, p<.001) indicating that detection of the task-relevant luminance change was highly impaired on perceptual conflict (LOB) trials.
highly significantP = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Two-way PERMANOVA indicated that there was a highly significant difference in benthic assemblage between location (F 4, 103 = 4.39, P = 0.001, ECV = 38.42%) and between sites within location (F 17, 103 = 12.16, P = 0.001, ECV = 43.15%), suggesting that significant variability in community types exists both between and among high-latitude locations.
highly significantp <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We also ran a logistic regression to evaluate if ISI-cal was associated with future CVD events independent of metabolic syndrome, and found that the association between CVD and ISI-cal was highly significant (OR 4.7, 95% CI 2.9–7.4, p <0.001), even when metabolic syndrome was in the model (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.1, p = 0.02).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found highly significant (p < 0.001) and positive correlations between connectedness with nature of respondents and the degree to which they expressed feelings that the competition: motivated conservation in general; motivated electricity conservation; motivated water conservation; and empowered conservation actions. 3.3.5.
highly significantP<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Consistent with this finding, there was a very strong (Pearson r = -0.917) and highly significant (P<0.001) correlation between PiB binding (reflected by an increased standardized uptake value ratio) and impaired performance on the “Dots” and “Cubes” sections of the VOSP ( Figure 1C ).