Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp = 2.98×10 −120.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, individuals possessing at least one copy of the minor T allele of the IL6R SNP rs4537545 expressed higher levels of sIL6R than those homozygous for the major C allele (averages 42.84 ng/mL and 29.36 ng/mL, respectively, data not shown), and this difference was highly significant ( p = 2.98×10 −12 ).
highly significantp = 2.24 e-110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Functional enrichment analysis of this set of 46 genes using FatiGO ( http://babelomics.bioinfo.cipf.es ) revealed a highly significant enrichment (Fisher exact test, two-tailed, p = 2.24 e-11 ) for genes annotated with gene ontology (GO) term GO:0006952 (defense response), with 39.1% (18/46) of the upregulated genes associated with this term, compared to 2.61% in the whole Arabidopsis genome.
highly significantp = 3.88×10 −110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
After adjusting for LYZ expression, the trans association observed with rs317657 were reduced, but remained highly significant, p = 3.88×10 −11 , p = 1.15×10 −7 , p = 2.52×10 −6 , p = 1.65×10 −10 , p = 7.16×10 −29 , p = 2.44×10 −5 , p = 8.23×10 −28 , p = 1.81×10 −13 , p = 5.66×10 −10 for CNTN6 , CTRC , COPZ2 , KRT9 , LRRFIP1 , NOD1 , PCDHA6 , ST5 and TRAF3IP2 , respectively.
highly significantp = 6.58×10 −110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Confirmatory genotyping in the 2nd stage By genotyping of these associated SNPs using a custom BeadChip (Illumina) in a different sample population of 1,671 individuals from the Yamagata cohort, we successfully confirmed all these associations at highly significant levels ranging from p = 6.58×10 −11 (rs500498) to 1.33×10 −21 (rs8176746) for P-LIP and from 2.96×10 −10 (rs2073824) to 8.34×10 −39 (rs495828) for ACE in 9q32, and also from 1.13×10 −29 (rs4461142) to 5.21×10 −107 (rs4362) for ACE in 17q23.2, as listed in Tables 1 and 2 .
highly significantp = 6.8e-110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
First, there was a very highly significant correlation (r = .99, p = 6.8e-11) between the progression of recognition scores for words and consonants as a function of SNR (respectively Figure 2 and Figure 5 ), whereas the correlation between the progression of recognition scores for words and vowels was lower (r = .94, p = 3.8e-6), but still high.
highly significantp = 7.4×10 −110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A Fisher's exact test revealed that the observed degree of overlap was highly significant for both data sets; 44 genes overlapped (p = 7.4×10 −11 , odds ratio = 3.4) with the c-myc cancer gene database and 31 genes overlapped with the c-Myc ChIP list (p = 3.2×10 −7 , odds ratio = 3.0).