Results were interpreted as highly significant*** (p<0.001), significant** (p<0.01), weakly significant* (p<0.05) or not significant ns (p>0.05).
Excerpts
One way analysis of variance showed highly significant differences between all AEZs for all variables (at p < 0.001).
Consistently for both subgroups and all speech conditions (bw8, bw16, fw8, fw16), driving input on A1 and Pv was highly significant (A1: p < 0.001, Pv: p < 0.01; corr.) ( Fig 5A , Table 3 ).
Distance to old oil palm plantations is an extremely significant variable (p < 0.001) having a negative effect on forest conversions to oil palm plantations during both time periods (pre-2000 and post-2000) and could be considered the most important determinant of forest conversion to oil palm plantations.
New: Figure 2 Kidney function using a) creatinine and b) GFR as surrogates during the follow-up period of 60 months (black HC, grey nESPC) HC = historic cohort, nESPC = new European Senior Program cohort, *** highly significant, p < 0.001 Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
There was a highly significant positive correlation between task cycle and performance (ρ = 0.924, p < 0.001) ( S2 Dataset ).
This was evident by a highly significant reduction (p<0.001) in mean fluorescence detected during 6 h period ( Figure 3A ).
Note however that this post-hoc analysis did not remove the strong difference in occipital/posterior cingulate ratio between the CAA and AD groups, which remained highly significant ( p <0.001).
The correlation was highly significant (Spearman’s rho –0.906, p<0.001).
A paired t -test comparing the accuracy of the participants in the first training session and the last training session (11 th session) showed a highly significant difference ( t (14) = 4.32, p <0.001), Figure 4 .
LMM analysis revealed a highly significant decrease in negative mood immediately following SKT1 practice ( b = 0.572, t (522.79) = 42.12, p < .001), representing a large effect size (Paired Cohen’s d = 1.00, 95% CI [0.91, 1.09]).
The term for lantana density in a given cell was found to be highly significant (Likelihood Ratio Test, LR statistic = 52.96, P <0.001), indicating that lantana density in the previous time step was an important predictor of lantana density in the next time step.
The mean and standard deviations were compared using Students' t-test with the following statistical criteria: p<0.05, significant; p<0.01, highly significant; p<0.001 extremely significant.
It is clear that the net effect of gender on the increasing level of HCE is negative and highly significant [ß = -0.148; p<0.001; 95% CI (-0.206, -0.091)]; that is, spending on major morbidity is less likely for females than for males.
On trend analysis, only serum IL-2, IL-6, and log serum APN levels showed an increasing trend for serum cytokines (all P < 0.001).
p < 0.05 was accepted as level of significance; *** very highly significant p < 0.001; ** highly significant p < 0.01; * significant p < 0.05; NS not significant for p > 0.05.
The analysis of isolation-by-distance revealed a high and highly significant positive correlation between geographic and genetic distances ( r = 0.716, p <0.001).
This is almost four times as high as it was before migration and thus statistically highly significant (P = 0.001).
Moreover, MTA1-knockdown tumors treated with compounds had further response, and the differences versus EV-Ctrl became highly significant (p = 0.001 for resveratrol, p = 0.0004 for PTER).
This is in contrast to changes in post-mortem muscle pH over time ( Fig 2 , right panel), where the fitted GAMM indicated highly significant differences between the crowded and control groups ( F = 23.0, df = 1, p < 0.001).
Overall significance of the treatment effect is also highly significant (p<0.001).
The entire model had an adjusted R 2 of 0.79; 0.64 of the variance was explained by the first axis, and 0.14 of the variance was explained by the second axis, with both of these values highly significant (p<0.001, 999 permutations).
Results and discussion Effect of process parameters on MRR The ANOVA results and standard regression coefficient for MRR are presented in Tables 5 and 6 respectively at a 95% confidence level and the results showing that the regression model for MRR is highly significant (F = 67.84, p < 0.001).
This showed that the average disease risk difference between trimester 1 and 2 was highly significant ( P <0.001 in all methods ( Fig. 4 )) confirming that PIH has vastly different effects on developing fetuses and the subsequent general health of children depending on timing of exposure.
Common garden experiment There was no significant effect of pond category (fish/no fish ponds) on shell shape as explained by the first principal component ( F 1, 7 = 0.06, p = 0.98), whereas there was a highly significant effect of treatment (fish/no fish cues; F 1, 7 = 467.2, p <0.001).