Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,910 sentences · 1 filter applied

[ 30 ], the mean difference, limit of agreement (LoA), as well as Bland-Altman index were calculated, after a log transformation applied due to non-parametric distribution, as commonly applied [ 34 ], while a Bland-Altman index of 5% was interpreted as a positive validation [ 35 ] and a Bland-Altman index of 10% was interpreted as a borderline significant [ 36 ], which was assumed a priori [ 37 ], (2) analysis of cross-classification in quartiles: the share of correctly classified and grossly misclassified (classified to the opposite quartiles) individuals were indicated, while at least 50% of correctly classified and, at the same time, less than 10% of grossly misclassified individuals was interpreted as a positive validation [ 38 ]; (3) analysis of the weighted κ statistic: as a method recommended by Cade et al.
Our longitudinal analyses showed that a higher frequency of SAMF consumption at baseline predicted a higher increase of all anthropometric indexes over the two-years follow up in all children groups with the exception of older girls, in which only a positive trend for waist circumference was observed.
Interestingly, DHEAS was significantly lower (−11.3% with 95% CI: −18.3, −3.7%, p -trend = 0.01) comparing the extreme quartiles of flavan-3-ol intake, however in contrast, DHEAS tended to increase significantly across quartiles of flavanone intake, although the difference between the highest and the lowest quartiles were only marginally significant (9.0% with 95% CI: −0.3%, 19.3%, p -trend = 0.04).