The significance for regression analysis of variance indicates that the regression is extremely significant, p = 0.0001, and non-significant, p = 1.0000, for the missing term, with R 2 = 0.9726 and R 2 Adj = 0.9374.
Excerpts
Statistical analysis confirmed that IC 50 treatment caused a highly significant increase in intracellular ROS generation compared with the untreated control group (0 μg/100 μL; **** p < 0.0001).
The reduction in both the predicted downregulated and knock-out lines was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) supporting the predictions of the gene-editing effects on the hss gene in Table 1 .
Based on the results, it showed that the model is highly significant when the computed F -value is greater than the tabulated F -value and the probability value is low ( p < 0.0001), indicating that the individual terms in each response model were significant on the interaction effect.
The study group ( Table 2 ) showed a highly significant postoperative increase in both CRP ( p < 0.0001) and IL-6 ( p = 0.0092) concentrations.
Statistical analysis confirmed that the differences between the EO and Trolox controls were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for both methods. 2.5.
The post hoc Tukey’s test shown in Figure 5 provides strong statistical evidence for this cytotoxic effect, particularly at 100 μg/mL, which showed highly significant reductions in cell viability ( p < 0.0001).
A highly significant cytotoxic effect ( p < 0.0001) was identified in MDA-MB-231 (100 to 700 μM) and in MDA-MB-468 (100 to 400 μM).
Worsening was highly significant when compared to basal values (BV; p < 0.0001 vs.
The results indicated that the model for 2, 6-DIPA hydrolysis efficiency is highly significant, with an F-value of 50.59 and a p -value < 0.0001.
The quadratic terms (A 2 , B 2 , C 2 , D 2 ) and interaction terms (AB, AC, BD, CD) were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while BC was significant at the p < 0.01 level ( Table 5 ).
The statistical difference between the NaCl and NaOH groups was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), confirming the non-irritating nature of NaCl.
The extraction temperature ( X 2 ) and time ( X 3 ) showed a highly significant impact on the extracted amount of rhein because of their p -values of <0.0001.
The results indicated that the regression model was highly significant ( F = 116.64, p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit term was not significant ( p > 0.05) [ 34 ].
The ANOVA data indicated that this regression model was highly significant ( p value < 0.0001) with an F value of 84.71.
The model was found to be highly significant, as evidenced by the results of an F-test, which gave an F-value of 1655.45 ( p < 0.0001).
Multiple regression analysis of the experimental data yielded the following second-order polynomial equation (Equation (1)), which describes the relationship between the response variable and the independent variables: (1) Oil yield (%) = 33.84 + 0.5783A + 0.8342B + 0.4008C + 0.8633D + 0.5550AB + 0.2425AC + 0.1675AD + 0.6150BC − 0.2725BD + 0.2550CD − 2.08A 2 − 1.31B 2 − 2.09C 2 − 1.32D 2 As shown in Table 3 , the regression model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit test was not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating that the model is statistically valid and well-fitted to the experimental data.
The model F-value of 178.56 indicated that the model was highly significant at p < 0.0001.
Highly significant main effects of cell line (F = 428.7, p < 0.0001), ICG concentration (F = 312.4, p < 0.0001), and time after irradiation (F = 189.6, p < 0.0001), a significant line × concentration interaction (F = 67.3, p < 0.0001) confirmed the difference in sensitivity.
ANOVA results ( Table 1 ) indicated that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit was not ( p = 0.5908).
Second-order polynomial models fitted to both responses were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with non-significant lack-of-fit terms; R 2 values of 0.9764 and 0.9865 confirmed adequate model fit ( Table S5 ).
One-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of the nanohybrid loading on TPC (F(3,8) = 784.5, p < 0.0001).
According to Table 3 , the ANOVA for the response surface quadratic regression model showed that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with a very high F -value (211.56 and 253.50).
Spermatozoa treated with TTO showed a decreasing trend for TotM ( Figure 3 A) already at 0.4 mg/mL, statistically appreciable only from 0.8 mg/mL ( p = 0.0003).
A Kruskal–Wallis test revealed highly significant differences in yield among climate zones (H = 19.119, df = 3, p = 0.0003) ( Table 7 ).