Although the highly significant enrichment metabolic pathways ( p -value < 0.01) were different in the three comparison groups, the biosynthesis of phenolic acids, namely, the “phenylpropanoid biosynthesis” pathway, was included in the highly significant enrichment metabolic pathways in all comparison groups ( Figure S4, Table S3 ).
Excerpts
The expression levels of SOD, GSH, and MDA in the DOP-100 group showed no significant difference ( p > 0.05), but significant differences ( p < 0.05) or highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) were observed in the other DOP groups. 2.8.
There was a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01) in the Simpson and Shannon indices between the MOD and CON groups ( Table 1 ).
The model was considered statistically significant when p < 0.05 and was considered highly significant when p < 0.01.
Significant differences were estimated as “***”, p < 0.001 (very highly significant); “**”, p < 0.01 (highly significant); “*”, p < 0.05 (significant); “ns”, p > 0.05 (not significant). 4.
The linear term D, the interaction terms AB showed highly significant effects ( p < 0.01).
Among them, the eluent concentration and pH had extremely significant ( p < 0.01) effects on purified flavonoids ( Table 4 and Table 5 ).
Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.01.
It was different and highly significant from the 36.7% of flies that chose the B. cruckchanksii EO ( p ≤ 0.01), and significantly different from the 39.5% of flies that chose P. uviferum EO ( p ≤ 0.05).
Compared with the CDP group, the C max of CA increased significantly ( p < 0.05), and V z/F of CA had a highly significant rise in the JGL group ( p < 0.01), but there was no significant difference in the AUC and MRT between the two groups.
Within male and female sheep, the V d had a significant difference ( p < 0.05) and CL had an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).
As expected, anthocyanins, flavanol and flavonol, which can easily react with acetaldehyde, were also positively and highly correlated with the antioxidant parameters, and the correlation of these phenols with TEAC all reached highly significant levels ( p < 0.01) in all wines.
The relative content differences of eight key VOCs in WO from five varieties can be directly compared by Kruskal–Wallis tests, among which the distribution four substances, hexanal (M), hexanal (D), pentanal (M), (E)-2-hexanal (M), presented extremely significant differences (P<0.01).
The increased expression of CD69 on NK cells treated with PBI was highly significant at the three highest concentration, whereas for oleandrin this was seen for the two highest concentrations ( p < 0.01).
Highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) were revealed among the pomegranate varieties for the majority of measured contents.
Figure 4 f shows that there are quite significant differences ( p < 0.01) in the percentage of apoptotic MCF-7 cells in the concentration range of AcGEP investigated in this study, compared with the control group.
Compared with the control group, the difference was extremely significant in the juglone treatment group ( p < 0.01).
Statistical Analysis The statistical estimation of the significance of the results obtained in the trials was performed using the ANOVA test, in which the objective was to compare the means between the control and treated groups, establishing significant probability values ( p ) < 0.05 [ 99 ] and considering the highly significant values of p < 0.01.
The results showed that STZ-diabetic rats exhibited a highly significant decrease in serum GSH levels relative to healthy controls ( p < 0.01), while those in groups treated with every concentration of both RR and BR showed a marked elevation relative to untreated diabetic rats ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 4 A).
The results of the correlation analysis showed that there was a highly significant ( p < 0.01) correlation between TPC, DPPH scavenging capacity, and ABTS scavenging capacity, whereas there was a significant ( p < 0.05) correlation between TFC, DPPH scavenging capacity, and ABTS scavenging capacity.
As depicted in Table 1 , the results of ANOVA indicated that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.01), but the lack of fit of each of the models was not significant.
The correlation coefficients between antioxidant capacity and total phenolic content were positive and highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) for the DPPH radical and significant ( p ˂ 0.05) for the ABTS radical in both samples.
The final difference in cancer prevalence was highly significant ( p < 0.01) by chi-squared test analysis.
The regression model was highly significant ( p < 0.01), while the lack of fit was not significant ( p = 0.317 > 0.05) and the value of the determination coefficient (R 2 ) was 0.996, which indicated the goodness of fit of the regression model [ 19 ].
The model F-value is 30.7, which is highly significant ( p < 0.01), and the p -value of the out−of−fit term is 0.3261, which is not significant ( p > 0.05), showing that the equation is similar to the actual data.