The concentration of serum triglyceride (TG) in red ginseng, high-dose ethyl acetate, and low dose n -butanol fraction groups were lower than that in the control group ( p < 0.05), with the high-dose n -butanol group being more highly significant ( p < 0.01).
Excerpts
The regression model for BDSO yield was highly significant ( p < 0.01).
Statistical differences were considered significant when p < 0.05 (*), and highly significant when p < 0.01 (**). 5.
Cells pre-incubated with Sveva also showed a significant decrease ( p < 0.05) in lipid peroxidation ( Figure 4 ), especially for H 2 O 2 5 μM and a highly significant one ( p < 0.01) for H 2 O 2 ≥ 50 μM compared to controls.
Highly significant differences (P ≤ 0.01) were observed among the different doses of irradiation.
However, the quadratic effect ( X 1 2 , X 2 2 , X 3 2 ) was found to produce extremely significant ( p < 0.01) positive effect on both Y 1 and Y 2 , but X 4 2 was only significant for Y 2 .
The analysis of variance showed that this regression model was highly significant (P < 0.01) with an F- value of 198.23, implying a good fit between the predicted model and the experimental data.
Differences of mean absorbance values within the same incubation time (24 h or 48 h), between different AgNPs concentrations were highly significant ( p < 0.01, ANOVA Friedman ANOVA test).
It is clear from the ANOVA results ( Table 3 ) that the model was highly significant and meaningful with a very low probability value ( p < 0.01) and high SS for all responses, which can appropriately explain the relationship between each response and independent variable.
However, when compared to diclofenac, diclofenac showed a highly significant ( p < 0.01) analgesic effect.
There is a highly significant positive correlation ( p < 0.01) between the LOX inhibitory activity and anti-enteritis activity in Smurf Drosophila model.
The expression levels of SOD, GSH, and MDA in the DOP-100 group showed no significant difference ( p > 0.05), but significant differences ( p < 0.05) or highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) were observed in the other DOP groups. 2.8.
Pearson’s correlation matrix showed a highly significant correlation between the TP content, flavonoid content and DPPH radical-scavenging activities (r = 0.98, p = 0.01) ( Table 2 ). 3.
However, a 500 mg/kg dose produced highly significant results ( p < 0.01) by prominently increasing the weight and feed intake close to normal.
In addition, except for time (X 4 ), other factors were highly significant ( p -value < 0.01).
Nevertheless, oral administration of ECE at 800 mg/kg ( Figure 1 b; D + E8) caused significant declines of the fasting blood glucose compared to those of the DC rats at the correspondingly same day from the 2nd to the 7th day ( p < 0.05) and extremely significant decreases since the 10th day ( p < 0.01).
Table 2 also reveals that the interaction of extraction time and extraction temperature was insignificant ( p > 0.05), while all other model terms were highly significant ( p < 0.01).
The letters above the bars in figures represent different groups with highly significant differences ( p < 0.01).
The model F-value is 30.7, which is highly significant ( p < 0.01), and the p -value of the out−of−fit term is 0.3261, which is not significant ( p > 0.05), showing that the equation is similar to the actual data.
All reported probability values were two-tailed and a 0.05 level of significance was considered, while marking the highly significant values (i.e., p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) as well.
Under optimal conditions (urea/FA-EE mass ratio of 2.38:1 at 15 °C for 2.5 h of crystallization), the concentrations and recoveries of PUFAs (EPA, DPA, and DHA) were 71.35% and 82.31%, respectively, and the models for EPA, DPA, and DHA were highly significant ( p < 0.01) at the 99% confidence level (EPA purity of 28.97%) [ 98 ].
Among them, violaxanthin myristate and lutein were extremely significant positive correlations with color ( p < 0.01), and they were closely related to the color quality of fermented pepper sauces.
Compared with the CDP group, the C max of CA increased significantly ( p < 0.05), and V z/F of CA had a highly significant rise in the JGL group ( p < 0.01), but there was no significant difference in the AUC and MRT between the two groups.
In figures, * indicate significant difference ( p < 0.05) while ** indicates extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01). 3.
As can be seen from Figure 1 D, the sugar partiality of the ASPS group, EE group, syringin group and positive control group was, respectively, 58.04%, 63.02%, 61.62% and 60.72%, which were extremely significant compared with the model group ( p < 0.01).