From Table 10 , it is shown that the model is highly significant ( p < 0.001), and confirms that it can be used to simulate the response adequately.
Excerpts
For measurements taken at the top of the samples, a highly significant effect of material type on the degree of conversion was observed ( p -value < 0.001).
2-way ANOVA and Bonferroni posttests show highly significant increase of BMP2 concentration in the wells treated with Ti-BMP2 and BMP2 versus controls ( p < 0.001).
The volume increase represents an average growth of 17.52 nm 3 per second and the volume increase is highly significant compared to the first time point ( p < 0.001).
Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences among the experimental groups ( p < 0.001).
Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant relationship between a slight increase in OLR and granule growth ( p < α , p = 0.0010 for R1, p = 0.0023 for R2, and p = 0.0011 for R3) ( Figure 5 ).
The mean deviation of surface roughness SMD gets highly significant correlation value ( p < 0.001) to tensile properties.
Experiment (1) revealed no negative impact by HEDP on available chlorine (1), while all three experiments showed a highly significant ( p > 0.001) synergistic effect, which was not hampered by HEDP, between NaOCl and ultrasonic activation regarding tissue weight loss (1, 3) and dissolution of gelatin (2).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirms that all fitted slopes are statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001 for all), robustly supporting the declining trend.
All observed data was statically analyzed at a 95% confidence level using ANOVA, and individual group was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) for each treatment (different alloy compositions) at different time intervals (days).
The ANOVA results reveal that the tool-axis orientation is the dominant factor affecting the bottom height deviation (Δ h ), with a highly significant p -value ( p = 0.001).
Overall Analysis of ΔE 00 The three-way repeated measures ANOVA ( Table 2 ) revealed highly significant main effects for Material (F = 184.15, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.672), Beverage (F = 472.31, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.955), and Immersion time (F = 1165.49, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.928).
The face temperature continued to increase after using both, with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between conditions of wearing one or not doing it.
As the correlation between pull-out force and pull-out force per area was found to be highly significant and very strong (Pearson’s correlation coefficient R = 0.970, p < 0.001), pull-out force was used as the only biomechanical parameter for the remaining animals. 2.6.
The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed a highly significant overall difference in gingival thickness between groups (χ 2 = 55.66, df = 3, p < 0.001).
One-way ANOVA revealed that crack depth had an extremely significant effect on R -value ( F (10, 429) = 35.5, p < 0.001).
The extremely small p values (4.4 × 10 −8 and 6.3 × 10 −12 ) indicate that the slopes are highly significant ( p < 0.001), demonstrating that the observed wavelength shifts originate from real humidity-induced swelling rather than random noise.
The interaction is large and highly significant (F = 44.59, p < 0.001; Adj SS = 13.583 MPa 2 , ≈24.8%), confirming that the influence of T depends on the chosen layer height and vice versa.
The tests of between-subjects effects indicated that Factor A (face yarn type) had a highly significant influence on the thermal resistance of the garment ensemble (F(5,36) = 28.874, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.800), upper garment (F(5,36) = 23.768, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.768), and lower garment (F(5,36) = 20.668, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.742; see Supplementary Table S1 ).
For the mean drop angle, there was a highly significant difference between brands (F(2,12) = 192.40, p < 0.001), with a large effect size (η 2 p = 0.97).
Most notably, the TTH demonstrated a highly significant divergence between groups ( p < 0.001), with the S group demonstrating the shortest median TTH of 94 s (IQR: 86–98) compared to 256 s (IQR: 245–295) in the C group and 120 s (IQR: 78–131) in the T group, as presented in Table 10 and Figure 6 . 4.
The statistical analysis revealed a highly significant main effect for the species with F (2, 81) = 178.157 and p < 0.001, indicating that the dependent variable varied substantially across the different wood species.
As shown in Figure 3 a, the results exhibited a highly significant difference in wet shear strength between the SPI/POSS-U/SB-1.5 adhesive and the pristine SPI adhesive (*** p < 0.001).
When all nine cement samples are pooled, the linear regression is highly significant, yielding R 2 = 0.94 ( p < 0.001), with slope = −2.53 ± 0.57 and intercept = 2.76 (95% confidence intervals).
The difference was highly significant (n = 6, p < 0.001). 3.1.2.