According to statistical analyses (see Figure 8 D–F), highly significant differences in cytotoxicity were found between the two types of treatment ( p < 0.01).
Excerpts
Bodyweight A three-way ANOVA evaluating change in bodyweight from 4 months (time of irradiation) to 11 months (beginning of behavior tests) of age revealed an unexpected highly significant main effect of radiation exposure ( p = 0.01) and an expected significant effect of sex ( p = 0.04) ( Figure 1 C).
The lignin contents of leaves, leaf sheaths, and stems of the brittle stem mutant were all lower than those of the WT, and these differences were extremely significant ( p < 0.01; Figure 1 E,F). 2.2.
Statistical differences were designated as significant if p -values were less than 0.05 ( # p ≤ 0.05), and highly significant if p -values were less than 0.01 ( ## p ≤ 0.01), less than 0.001 ( ### p ≤ 0.001) and less than 0.0001 ( #### p ≤ 0.0001).
no supplementation) was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.01) in the reduction of all inflammatory markers studied, with the reduction in the former group being markedly greater than in the latter.
Similar to that presented in proliferating stage, a highly significant increase in circTCF4 levels ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 4 A) was accompanied by an insignificant change in TCF4 mRNA ( Figure 4 B).
The interaction of different lines and water status has a highly significant effect on CC, LA, PH, NNMS, BN, RWCL, and BIOMASS ( p < 0.01), a significant effect on SWPP ( p < 0.05), and no significant effect on the trait RECL. 2.2.
Except for the initial sampling on day -12, the differences in GSH-Px activity between the STG and CON groups were highly significant ( p < 0.01) at all subsequent measurement points ( Figure 1 A). 2.3.
On the other hand, downregulation of CPS1 and TRIP6 protein in the low mRNA expression group was highly significant (Student ́s t -test; p < 0.01) in comparison to control ovarian tissues.
Statistical differences were stated as significant if the p-values were less than 0.05 (* p ≤ 0.05) and highly significant if the p-values were less than 0.01 (** p ≤ 0.01) or less than 0.001 (*** p ≤ 0.001).
RT-qPCR and Western blot results shown in Figure 4 described a highly significant increase in Myc compared to its target gene, cyclin D2 , at mRNA and protein expression levels ( p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively). 2.4.
With increasing concentrations of NPD, a dose-dependent recovery of cells was observed in G2/M, which became highly significant at 25 and 50 μg/mL NPD ( p < 0.01) at 48 h of co-treatment ( Figure 4 c). 2.5.
The observed differences in the values of the average NPB number/sample between the exposure times of 3 h and 24 h for each silver solution were highly significant ( p < 0.01; Table 2 ).
Both inter- (*) and intra-individual (●) significances were calculated and designated as significant if the p -values were less than 0.05 (*/● p ≤ 0.05), and highly significant if the p -values were less than 0.01 (**/●● p ≤ 0.01) or less than 0.001 (***/●●● p ≤ 0.001).
The difference analysis results showed that the difference between the two different concentration groups was extremely highly significant ( p < 0.01) ( Figure S1 in File S1 ). 2.2.
The results of the SSP analysis of variance showed that temperature and tissue × gene have highly significant ( p < 0.01) effect on the expression of S. maximus PPAR genes.
In addition, there was a highly significant increase in relative cell death ( Figure 2 D: WB-EMS post versus Ctrl post, p < 0.01; WB-EMS post versus pre, p < 0.05) when MDA-MB-231 cells were stimulated for 48 h with WB-EMS trained patient serum.
Different letters indicate significant differences ( p < 0.05) and highly significant differences ( p < 0.01).
The difference was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).
Statistically, “**” indicates highly significant differences ( p < 0.01), “*” indicates significant differences ( p < 0.05), and “N.S.” indicates non-significant differences ( p > 0.05). 5.
Most amino acids were modulated [highly significant difference between the stress treatment and control ( p < 0.01) and fold changes of <0.67 (−0.58 on log 2 scale) or >1.5 (>0.58 on log 2 scale)], with enhanced concentrations in the stress treatment groups compared to the control.
Evident and highly significant ( p < 0.01) decreases in expression were recorded in the MBH and hippocampal CA1 in response to both KYNA doses in comparison to the control group; however, CAT transcript abundance in the CA1 was lower ( p < 0.05) in sheep infused with the KYNA20 dose than in those receiving the KYNA100 dose.
As can be seen in Table 2 , the coefficients for the linear terms ( X 1 , X 2 and X 3 ) and the quadratic terms ( X 1 2 and X 3 2 ) were highly significant ( p < 0.01).
Accordingly, correlation analysis of the phototoxicity values obtained for the two PSs revealed a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.01; Pearson two-tailed correlation, data not shown). 2.1.2.
Statistical Analyses Data were processed in Microsoft Excel 2023 and GraphPad Prism software version 10 was used for all statistical analyses, including the calculation of serum and exosome concentrations, means, standard deviations (SDs), coefficient of determination (R 2 ), and p values (where * significant p < 0.05; ** highly significant p < 0.01; n.s. denotes non-significant).