There is a highly significant positive correlation between TDF and oil content (0.407, p < 0.001) as both fiber and fat decrease starch digestibility (as evidenced by the negative correlation of starch with TDF and oil) and thus would have a positive correlation with each other.
Excerpts
Based on the order of priority: biophysical drivers such as water stress, weeds, insect pest, and disease, over flooding, and low soil fertility was highly significant (P ≤ 0.001) among four yield groups in Table 4 .
On running the Mann-Kendall test on temperature and rainfall data, the null hypothesis (H 0 ) of “no trend present” is tested against the alternative hypothesis (H 0 ) of “trend present.” The results from the test show that there exists a significant trend in the Minimum Temperature (p < 0.001) whilst the behavior of Maximum Temperature (p < 0.281) and Rainfall (p < 0.068) recorded over the period shows no significant trend (see Table 4 ). 4 Discussion 4.1 Land use change analysis To fully appreciate the degree of cover changes over the 30 years, the annual rate of change was used ( Eq.
Bartlett's test was highly significant for all domains (p-value <0.001), indicating that the data was appropriate for CFA.
Among the examined genes, the expression levels of VPS 28 exhibited a highly significant statistical difference between the two groups in the MAFLD dataset (P < 0.001).
All the four tests (Wilks' lambda, Pillai's trace, Lawley-Hotelling trace and Roy's largest root) were highly significant (p < 0.001).
On the regression model, was extremely significant (P < 0.001), but the ANOVA for lack of fit was insignificant (P > 0.05).
The results of one-way ANOVA showed that the data had extremely significant statistical significance ( p < 0.001).
The highly significant result (p < .001) showed that women tended to have significantly higher verbal reasoning ability than men.
3 Results and discussion 3.1 Physicochemical properties of organic amendments There were highly significant (P < 0.001) differences among all physical and chemical properties of the organic amendments.
Highly significant interactions ( p ≤ 0.001) were found among the tested rootstocks and locations regarding vegetative growth parameters, except for the trunk diameter index.
With regards to the average number of secretory granules of submandibular serous acini cells, there was a markedly significant decrease (p < 0.001) in the high-fat diet group (7 ± 2.3) compared to the untreated group (95 ± 4.6).
In model M1, the KMO index was satisfactory, with the value = 0.863, and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity showed a highly significant (χ 2 = 1272.29, df = 91, p -value <0.001).
The differences of total extractives content between the two species were not statistically significant ( P = 0.254) but the site had a highly significant effect ( P < 0.001) with the trees of both species of site 2 being different from those of sites 1 and 3.
Similarly, the main effect of correction was highly significant, F (2, 149) = 68.309, p < .001, η 2 = 0.478.
There were highly significant difference (P < 0.001) between M2 and M3 microhardness values of the groups.
Variation and agronomic performance of evaluated robusta coffee clones Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) difference among the Robusta coffee clones for all the assessed traits ( Table 2 ).
The duration of diabetes exhibits a notable negative correlation with limits of stability, which is highly significant (B = −0.09, SE = 0.02; Beta = −0.31; t = −4.50, p = 0.001).
When compared to the control group, it was highly significant (P < 0.001).
All variables showed highly significant differences (p < 0.001) among studied samples.
This increase became markedly significant at the 45-day interval, suggesting a substantial rise in serum ALP activity and levels (P < 0.001) ( Fig. 4 A and B).
Leaf area [ cm 2 ] : The interactions of Azolla and nitrogen fertilizer on leaf area were highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001) ( Table 1 S).
As indicated in Table 1 , the comparison between the four groups was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001).
The model also showed that PP has a highly significant strong positive relationship (β = 0.69, P < 0.001) with the PU construct.
The heterogeneity accounting for the differences in effect sizes among the studies included in the meta-analysis was large and highly significant (Q (51) = 179.742, p < 0.001).