Data analyzed revealed that there was a significant effect of the forward speeds (FS) (p < 0.05), a highly significant effect for elevator velocities (ES) (p < 0.0001), and a highly significant effect for cutting knives speeds “CKS” (p < 0.01) on the collecting efficiency.
Excerpts
PFT was the primary source for systematic variation in CR and the difference between PFTs was highly significant (p < 0.0001) for all elements except for Cs (p = 0.14).
4 , it comes out that the existence of a highly significant difference (p <0.0001; α = 0.05) between the proportions of the different professions; meaning that occupations strongly influence the profiles of infant flours users.
Regarding immunological response, the Spearman correlation coefficient suggests a highly significant direct link between IL-2, TNF-α, and INF-γ and radiation doses (P < 0.0001).
The observed mean body weight ranged from 1.19 to 1.43 kg with highly significant (p < 0.0001) differences between districts and sex effects for all other morphometric traits.
There were highly significant differences (P < 0001) between the analysed mean Hg, As and turbidity levels and the permissible levels in surface water with the potential of affecting ecosystem services including water for drinking, water for recreational, water for irrigational, and water for aqua culture purposes.
The result showed the scolicidal effects of the synthesized nanoparticles extremely significant for all the four concentrations evaluated and at various exposure times in comparison to the control group (P < 0.0001).
3 A shows that the IpGTT produced a highly significant time-dependent increase in blood glucose concentrations in both WT (F = 23.85, p < 0.0001) and Tau-VLW (F = 14.16, p < 0.0001) mice.
The interaction between medium, forage and dose and the interaction between medium, forage and time were also both highly significant ( P < 0.0001). 4.
A nonparametric longitudinal factorial analysis (nparLFD) on the interaction of time and IP was highly significant (p < 0.0001) indicating that the decrease in anxiety scores was definitely due to the intervention.
Adding the ‘number of flowering species’ to the model showed a highly significant difference on both, number of butterfly species and individuals (mod4s, mod4i, p < 0.0001).
Moreover, the male group showed highly significant variation of Δ-MET as compared to females (∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 B).
The model difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), the misfit term was not significant ( p > 0.05), and the fit R 2 was close to 1, which proved that the model was well fitted and the regression equation could be used to analyze the effect of the factors on the peroxide value.
Similar to pre-swing, in the mid-stance phase the differences between the CTRL and RUP2 and RUP21 were highly significant (F = 24.68, p = 0.0001).
The F -values were highly significant at p < 0.0001 for all response variables, and the p -values were a coefficient significance check, together with the operating factor's power.
Furthermore, the variance analysis (ANOVA) presented in Table 4 disclosed that the quadratic model was exceedingly significant at P < 0.0001 for the estimation of phenolics from JATE.
Remarkably, the rate of apoptosis induced by the NISM@BSA-DEC-Zn nanocarriers revealed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) compared to the Ctrl group ( Fig. 10 A–C).
The measured 2.4–2.6% CO 2 concentration translates into a highly significant increase in CO 2 with a KN95 respirator and a valved respirator at the nasolabial fold (p < 0.0001), which is much greater than the NIOSH 8h threshold limit value [ 57 ].
According to ANOVA, the model was highly significant with a p-value (p < 0.0001) to predict the response values.
In our study, we employed a multivariate binary logistic regression model to investigate factors influencing the presence of PCC and their relationship with variations in PCC occurrence, yielding a highly significant model (p < 0.0001).
Highly significant (P < 0.0001) variation was perceived among the study locations for the mean squares of disease incidence, severity, AUDPC, disease progress rate, TSW, and GY due to interactions of wheat cultivars and chemical seed treatments.
The differences observed were highly significant: p < 0.0001.
Both relationships (LWR and LLR) were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with all r 2 values being ≥0.992. 3.3.
This represents a highly significant difference in cell cycle progression ( P < .0001 by χ 2 analysis).
The analysis of variance revealed that genotypes maintained highly significant (p < 0.0001) differences for final disease severity at both locations in the two cropping seasons ( Table 2 ).