2 B), the difference was significant for nine ( t -test, p < 0.05) strains and highly significant for five of these ( t -test, p < 0.01).
Excerpts
on the other hand, chlorophyll b showed a highly significant positive correlation with three antioxidant enzyme activities ( P <0.01).
The length parameters based on the length-length relationships of each sample were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.01).
These results were considered moderately significant when p < 0.01 and highly significant when p < 0.0001. 3 Results 3.1 Effect on body weight There was an insignificant difference in body weight in all groups in contrast to normal control before administering HFD.
The effect of social barriers is moderately significant with (t- value = 1.8749) and (β=0.1063, p < 0.01) thus hypothesis H1 got accepted.
Analysis for variance The analysis of variance (ANOVA) results shown in Table 2 reveal that the environment by genotype interaction effect is either highly significant (p-value <0.01) or significant (0.01 < p-value <0.05) or marginally significant (0.05 < p-value <0.1) on all 12 traits, indicating environmental variations among the tested varieties for yield and yield-related traits.
The T value of beta regression coefficients of the predictive variable is highly significant (p < 0.01). 4.
The liquid‒solid ratio (A), the extraction temperature (B) and the ultrasonic power (C), which affect the extraction of anthocyanins, reached a highly significant level (p < 0.01).
The total flavonoids and total anthocyanins content in this study had a highly significant (p < 0.01) and very strong positive correlation with their FRAP values (r = 0.92; r = 0.99, respectively).
The analysis of the variance of diversity index (H′) based on the regions showed highly significant (P < 0.01) variation for StP, LfC, GlC, LmC, LmCM, KrRw and KrC.
In this test, only severe deviations, that is, highly significant (p < .01) values, were considered as having a lack of statistical normality.
failed to reach significanceP < .01
01; however, its relation with other variables of the study failed to reach significance level. ‘Who decided’ was positively correlated with migration history, r (680) = 0.110, P < .01 and negatively with proactive coping, r (682) = .-0.078, P < .05.
Analysis of variance of GCA and SCA Analysis of variance for combining ability revealed highly significant ( P ≤ 0.01) estimates of mean sum of squares for both general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) of all the studied traits ( Table 5 ).
In addition, the protein levels of COX-2 and iNOS in the liver tissue exhibited an increasing trend with the occurrence of acute ALD ( P < 0.01), but they were significantly reduced after administration of medium- and high-dose RDAE ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01) ( Fig. 7 A–G).
The interaction effect of population x mode of corm preparation x corm type was highly significant (p < 0.01) on emergence condition of the corm (days to emergence) and significant (p < 0.05) on the frequency of regeneration and multiplication capacity (average number of shoot per corm) of the corms.
Highly significant correlations were found among all morphological traits ( p < 0.01 ).
RYMV disease severity and incidence There were highly significant differences (p ≤ 0.01) among the genotypes for disease severity ( Table 3 ).
The beta band in the parietal lobe had a decreasing trend in post-intervention and three months’ post-intervention (F = 7.14, P = 0.01), which was significant compared to pre-intervention.
The Cochrane-Armitage test indicates a declining trend in HGVBP (P = 0.01) and an increasing trend in SR (P < 0.01).
Stand count Highly significant ( P < 0.01) variation was observed among taro varieties concerning stand count in both years (Tables 2 , 3 & 4 ).
According to the analysis variance ( Table 6 ), the effect of factor A on hydrolytic activity was highly significant ( p < 0.01), that of factor C was significant ( p < 0.05), and that of factor B was not significant ( p > 0.05).
The highest mean concentration of total hardness was recorded in river water sample (422.67 ± 23.79 CaCO 3 mg/L) and there was highly significant difference (p < 0.01) between the mean value of total hardness obtained from river and reservoir water sample.
Consequently, directly after treatment the preference for CCLAD was statistically not significant (p = 0.27), but it became highly significant after reflection time (p = 0.013) ( Table 3 ).
Analysis of variance ( Table 3 ) revealed that C-888 had a highly significant effect (P = 0.013) on the EE% of AP-loaded CSLNs.
Marginally significant change in D-COP ML ( p = 0.015, CI 95 %: (−22.287, −2.557)) and D-COP PL ( p = 0.017, CI 95 %: (−39.593, −4.197)) from pre- to post-intervention was also observed within this group ( Table 2 ).