We also found a highly significant correlation of the general sense of coherence between T0 and T1 for the experimental group ( r = 0.885; p = 0.000).
Excerpts
Educational Resources also presented a highly significant effect ( p = 2.8 × 10 −22 ), with a moderate degree of association between categories ( φ c = 0.439), and the same was true for ESAR Facets ( p = 5.15 × 10 −16 ; φ c = 0.366).
Results demonstrated that all the three main effects were highly significant: semantic context, F (1,65) = 189.567, p = 6.12e−21, partial η 2 = 0.745; F 0 contours, F (1,65) = 277.133, p = 3.948e−25, partial η 2 = 0.81; group, F (1,65) = 22.554, p = 1.167e−5, partial η 2 = 0.258.
The overestimates were highly significant (1-tailed paired t -test, t = 26.60, df = 519, p < 2.2 −16 ).
While the baseline tracking time for short words did not differ significantly between L1 and L2 readers ( p >0.05), the group × length interaction was highly significant ( p < 7 e −16), indicating that L2 readers show a steeper increase in tracking time for long words compared to L1 readers.
The effect of set size was also highly significant [ F (2,54) = 73.84, p < 10 -11 , η p 2 = 0.73], showing that the Mooney face targets were not searched efficiently.
For “external oppression or challenge,” 28 out of 58 tragic descriptions met the consensus criterion, compared to 0 out of 59 joyful descriptions, yielding a highly significant association ( p = 3.68 × 10 −11 ).
Some 90 independent replications of these experiments have provided evidence for a highly significant effect (overall effect size = 0.09, z = 6.4, p = 1.2 × 10 –10 ; Bem et al., 2015 ).
These comparisons were also highly significant ( p < 10 −9 for all tests, one-sided Fisher's exact test) for the control participants.
Similar to the maximal model this regression analysis revealed statistically highly significant contrasts between CL task as the baseline and FB ( p = 1.37e-09) and IG task ( p = 1.96e-08) but no significant effect between CL and TB task ( p = 0.679).
Planned comparisons revealed a similar Laterality effect in French and Spanish [ F (1, 120) = 1.78, MSE = 32.31, p = 0.19, η 2 = 0.005] but a highly significant difference between these two groups and the Arabic group [ F (1, 120) = 223.12, MSE = 32.31, p < 0.000001, η 2 = 0.65].
The effect of the total fixation time advantage was highly significant ( p < 10 −6 ), ruling out this alternative explanation.
In all cases, the computed correlation coefficients turn out to be very highly significant ( p < 0.00001).
The mean of the MICs, 0.71 (range: 0.66 to 0.76, n = 166 for each), was highly significant, p < 0.00001 (SD across the 18 MICs = 0.03, 95% CI [0.72, 0.69]).
Lower HR after repeated performances The Friedman Test for changes in HR, including baseline (a 1 min run of hopping on the spot) and the three live performances, revealed highly significant changes ( p = 0.00001).
There was a strong relationship with sleep disturbance as indicated by highly significant correlations with all four SQS subscales (all p < 0.00001) but not with hours of sleep.
As a result of the general linear mixed model that included the familiarity index as a fixed factor, the effect of the familiarity index of character-specific learning was highly significant [ F (1,3576) = 48.84, p < 0.00001, f 2 = 0.007416].
The correlation between the initial decision and Δ f is highly significant (Spearman’s correlation: |ρ| = 1; p < 10 −5 ).
(b) The effect size (SMD) of the sadness and anger stimuli was 0.86 and 0.98, respectively, with that of the sadness stimuli being significant ( P = 0.02) and that of anger stimuli being highly significant ( P < 0.00001).
The main factor Language was highly significant, F (1, 33) = 98.69, p < 0.00001, reflecting the overall better performance of Tashlhiyt than French participants.
See the problem here? In the Bond and DePaulo (2006) meta-analysis, the 54% accuracy was greater than chance with a highly significant ( p < 0.00001) t of nearly 40.
Ego-Dissolution Inventory (EDI) and Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ) A paired comparison using the EDI revealed highly significant larger total scores for DMT compared to placebo ( T = 6.98, df = 12, p = 1.47e -5 , Cohen’s d = 2.67).
The DAVID program identified one cluster, characterized by a highly significant enrichment of genes involved in antigen processing and presentation ( p = 3.7e-5).
However, the rate at which the therapist provided prompts was a highly significant predictor of subject response rate ( b = 0.480, p = 0.00004; Figure 3 ).
Among pictures SR enhancement to phobia-related material was highly significant F (1,87) = 28.21, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.25, unlike the comparison between noises ( p > 0.10).