Excerpts

Results indicated that whilst sex [χ 2 (1) = 1.368, p = 0.242] did not predict pose orientation, selfie type proved a highly significant predictor [χ 2 (1) = 14.061, p = 0.000].

A highly significant difference was found [ t (70) = 4.531, p < 0.000] with music of male composers showing higher values (i.e., greater perceived femininity) than did works composed by females.

Trust in Vendor The hypothesis that IUES is significantly affected by trust in vendor-related hypotheses (F2 > 0.383) and is highly significant ( p < 0.000) is supported by the data.

The one-tailed multinomial probability of 140,432 pairs being located on a vector is highly significant [Bin ( n = 211,426, k = 140,432, q = 0.08) = 990(z), p = 0].

Interestingly, the results showed that the relationship between aversive leadership and work alienation is highly significant when PsyCap is low (β = 0.35, p = 0.00) but it becomes weakest and insignificant when PsyCap is high (β = 0.05, p > 0.05).

The hypothesis test demonstrated a highly significant relationship between awareness of consequences and attitude (H4) ( t = 8.164, p = 0).

A relationship of marginal significance between emotion to gender switch costs and the RT coefficient of variability (CV; β = −260.46521, p < 0.000) was found as well, which did not survive correction, and the overall model was significant [ R 2 = 0.12, adjusted R 2 = 0.07, F (15,75) = 2.318, p = 0.004].

The effect of morpheme reliability was highly significant (estimate = 1.937, SE = 0.537, z = 3.61, p = 0.000).

We also found a highly significant correlation of the general sense of coherence between T0 and T1 for the experimental group ( r = 0.885; p = 0.000).

The between-group differences in coefficient variation are also highly significant (SS = 0.018, df = 1, MS = 0.018, F = 61.490, p = 0.000, η 2 = 0.400), whereas the within-group differences are relatively smaller (SS = 0.027, df = 94, MS = 0.000).

Motivation appeared to have a highly significant negative impact on perceived effort ( β = −1.39, t = 21.03, p = 0.000) and perceived effort appeared to have a (less significant) negative impact on motivation ( β = −1.62, t = −4.69, p = 0.000).

The principle component was applied to conduct confirmatory factor analysis and the KMO was 0.913 and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.000).

Bartlett’s test results were also extremely significant ( p = 0.00).

The path coefficient is extremely strong at 0.958, with a negligible standard deviation of 0.009, resulting in a very high T statistic of 101.679, indicating a highly significant relationship ( p value = 0.00). 2.

Highly significant main effects of AOI were found [fixations: F (2,5 8 ) = 115.645, p = 0.000, viewing time: F (2,5 8 ) = 92.354, p = 0.000].

Furthermore, there was a statistical trend for the effect of group [ F (1, 30) = 3.6; MSE = 105309.68; p = 0.0 7; η p 2 = 0.11], indicating that the BH group was faster than the PH group.

The difference is statistically highly significant ( t = 5.93, p < 0.000) and with respect to effect size almost large (d = 0.70).

PTSD torture Kurd conflict refugees The correlation between PTSD 16 items and 29 items with total 45 items of the HTQ section V were highly significant ( r = 0.72, p = 0.000; r = 0.87, p = 0.000; respectively).

However, at T2, there were highly significant differences in UDVA for both eyes between the two groups (right eye: I-J = −0.254, P = 0.000, P < 0.01) (left eye: I-J = −0.242, P = 0.000, P < 0.01).

Analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences among the groups ( F = 15.89, p = 0.00).

emotion elicitation film clips IAPS pictures media effects movies Negative stimuli—effects of stimulus condition and gender The ANOVA for negative stimuli suggested the stimulus condition main effect was highly significant, F (1.6,223.5) = 196.3, p < 0.000, partial η 2 = 0.589.

Concerning the relationship between SoC and CP (hypothesis 6), the results in this study implied that a slightly significant correlation existed between students' perceived SoC and CP (β = 0.256, p < 0.0).

Regarding evolution over time within each group, in the PA Group there were no significant differences from T0 to T1 ( p = 0.248), with an extremely significant increase in the result from T1 to T2 ( p = 0.000), and an extremely significant difference between T0 and T2 ( p = 0.000) as well.

Here again, highly significant differences ( p = 0.000) and moderate effect size ( d = 0.66), although slightly higher than BS, are found.

The result is highly significant at ( U = 113457.000, p = 0.000).