Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,614 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
wheat landraces Ethiopian tetraploid wheat association analysis yellow rust resistance 90 K wheat SNP array Highly significant differences were observed among accessions and accessions by environments ( P < 0.0001) in ANOVA analyses for stripe rust response in the field tests, but no significant difference was detected among environments.
highly significantP = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This correlation is highly significant for the 24 non-agricultural strains ( r 2 = 0.47, P = 0.0002) while it was not significant for the 31 agricultural strains ( r 2 = 0.03, P = 0.33), suggesting that the relationship between aggressiveness and sclerotial production differ among these two populations of strains.
highly significantp =0.00040.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Precisely, PAL was more correlated with the non-reducing sugars ( R 2 =0.9767, p =0.0002) than reducing and total soluble sugars, while anthocyanin exhibited a highly significant correlation with non-reducing sugars ( R 2 =0.969, p =0.0004) and total soluble sugars ( R 2 =0.9686, p =0.0004) compared to the reducing sugars.
highly significantp -value = 0.00040.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Indeed, ABA3 expression kinetics obtained after infection by prtE and outC are not significantly or weakly significantly different from that obtained after buffer inoculation ( p -value = 0.0830 and 0.0411, respectively) in contrast to the highly significant differences between the WT strain ( p -value = 0.0004) or the hrcC mutant ( p -value = 0.0006) and the buffer ( Figure 3 and Supplementary Table S2 ).
highly significantP < 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Correlation Between Physiological and Thermal Variables The correlation between physiological (GFS, starch, frost hardiness and water content) and thermal (minimum, average and maximum temperature averaged over the last 1–30 days before harvest) variables were all highly significant ( P < 0.0005; Table S1 ).
highly significantp=0.00070.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Under R → RB → R and the reverse sequence, RB → R → RB, fitting the g s data to a linear mixed-effects model ( Tables S8 and S9 ) showed a highly significant effect of light (R-RB-R, p=0.0007;RB-R-RB, p=0.0060), but the main effect of species (R-RB-R, p=0.3455; RB-R-RB, p=0.8859) and its interaction with light (R-RB-R, p=0.2055; RB-R-RB, p=0.7486) were not significantly different.