Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,614 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results and discussion Highly significant differences ( p <0.001) for BSR response among AB-QTL lines were observed disease incidence (DI) in all field seasons, as well as disease rating (DR) and area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) in the greenhouse with a moderately high broad-sense heritability ( H 2 ) of 0.61 for the tested resistance parameters.
highly significantP< 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Soybean yield response as affected by Rh inoculation and P application A one-way ANOVA testing the effect of the treatment on grain yield was highly significant for the SS (F = 65.4, P< 0.001), NGS (F = 86.6, P< 0.001), and SGS (F = 127.3, P< 0.001) agroecological zones, respectively ( Figure 3 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When combining all five families selected, the percentage of early flowering individuals in the early flowering epimutant lines (74.5%) was nearly six times the percentage of control lines (13.3%, Table 4 ) and a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) was detected between early flowering families and the control.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
It is at the level of 180 g per plant per year, highly significant ( p < 0.001) with R 2 = 0.64 ( Supplementary Figure S1 , depicting all the individual plant replications of the selected families, as well as the corresponding frequency distributions of each year).
an increasing trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Results Vegetation cover changes during 1982 to 2020 in the Tibetan plateau As shown in Figure 3 , between 1982 and 2020, nearly 89% of the alpine ecosystem in the Tibetan Plateau showed an increasing trend in vegetation cover, with a rate of change of 0.0019 per year for VCI ( p < 0.001) and 0.0096 per year for LAI ( p < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The ANOVA results revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) across the genotypes (G) and genotype × year (G × Y) interactions but no significant differences between the two years (Y) ( Table 1 ). 3.3 Resequencing of sweet potato genotype resources and SNP calling Sequencing was performed after constructing a GBS library of the 96 genotypes.
highly significantP ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Similarly, the environment effect was highly significant (P ≤ 0.001, P ≤ 0.01, and P ≤ 0.05) for all the evaluated traits except for 4 traits (LA, LL, LW, SD) in ‘1-XY’בN188’, two trait (H, PL) in ‘ZL-3’בN188’, another trait (H) in both ‘ZL-3’בN188’ and the joint family.