Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,862 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantqualifiedgold
This demonstrated a highly significant association of the gene-proximal BAP1 binding sites with the genes involved in proteosome-dependent protein degradation, DNA damage response, and protein trafficking, and the association of the gene-distal BAP1 binding sites with the genes involved in the regulation of transcription and RNA processing ( Figure 5B , Supplementary Tables S3B, C ).
Furthermore, in 22 HLA-A2 + cases, we observed an almost significantly faster decrease in HBsAg level in those cases with HBVpol 455-63 -specific CD8 + T cells with preserved expansion ability with respect to those without reactive cells [16.2% (IQR 29.6) vs. 8.9% (IQR 9.14)] ( Figure 5C ). 4 Discussion In a previous large longitudinal study that followed up a cohort of HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection for 13 years, 2% of subjects per year of follow-up developed HBeAg(−) chronic hepatitis B.
However, while some subjects showed a trend for increasing S protein-specific CD8 + T cell frequencies after each antigen exposure (i.e., infection or booster vaccination), no significant differences in the frequencies of S protein-specific CD8 + T cells were found at any time point (excluding comparisons to the pre-vaccination time point, p >0.05, Dunn’s corrected Kruskal-Wallis test).
highly significantqualifiedgold
To focus specifically on motifs that were enriched in CDR3s with highly significant clonal expansion in the APOB-reactive compartment as compared to non-reactive control, we calculated the relative abundances of AIM + and AIM − CDR3s in each expanded group and calculated their log 2 fold change.
Although all different modalities showed a trend toward significance for the DRB1 molecule, only the EMS-3D score indicated statistical significance between patients On-IS vs. patients with stable chimerism (0.45 [0.30–0.61] vs. 0.24 [0.18–0.36], p=0.036), in which the significance was lost after applying the Bonferroni correction.
Because transcription factor binding sites induced by stimulation with factors such as LPS have been reported to have lower signal intensity ( 20 ), we suspected that a weak GATA4 binding signal induced in the region approximately 3000 bp upstream of IFIT1B in U937 cells upon 2′3′-cGAMP stimulation might be significant ( Figure 5B ).