Highly significant differences were defined by p < 0.01.
Excerpts
In the skin ( Figure 2B ), a moderate increase in SOD activity was detected at 12 hpi ( p< 0.05), followed by highly significant differences at 24 and 48 hpi ( p< 0.01), which returned to baseline levels by 72 hpi ( p> 0.05).
A significant difference was defined as P < 0.05, and a highly significant difference was defined as P < 0.01.
Significant differences were observed for TNF , IL-6 , and IL-10 , with TNF showing highly significant elevations in REAC and WR groups (p ≤ 0.01) under antigenic stimulation.
Statistically significant differences were designated at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.
As a result, viral loads in the BVDV + CDR H3 antibody group were significantly lower than those in the BVDV+PBS group at all time points ( P < 0.05), differences were highly significant on days 3, 5 and 7 ( P < 0.01) and remained significant on days 10 and 14 ( P < 0.05).
Among the subgroups, the difference in the pooled ORR was highly significant (p<0.01).
3.8 Effects of linarin and ETEC on colonic short-chain fatty acids As shown in Table 2 , relative to the BD+NB group, the LN+NB group exhibited a highly significant ( P < 0.01) increase in the levels of acetic, propionic, and butyric acids, along with a significant ( P < 0.05) increase in the level of isovaleric acid.
Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01.
Similarly, prognostic risk factors such as AFP, PT and tumor volume were approximately significant, with higher AIDRS correlating with increased risk ( P ≤ 0.01 ) ( Figures 8F–H ).
As observed in Figure 3C for BCG infected cells we noticed a highly significant ( P < 0.01) increase in antigen presentation levels.
Linear regression analysis provided several nominally significant (p < 0.01) metabolic changes between the two groups in diabetic individuals ( Table 2 ).
We found that 89 pathways ( Figure 7D ) were different (P<0.05), and 23 of them were highly significant (P<0.01).
Pearson correlation analysis was utilized to examine the relationship between two variables that met the criteria for normality, with the following significance indicators: a single asterisk (*) denoted a significant difference ( p < 0.05), and a double asterisk (**) signified a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01). 3.
The results were expressed as the means ± standard deviations (SD), ns represents no statistical difference between the two groups, * represents significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05), and ** represents extremely significant difference between the two groups (P<0.01).
The survival rate (53.94%) in the rMsIFN-γ group was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), which was higher than that in the control (11.84%) and the Trx group (26.31%) ( Figure 4B ).
the highest ROS fractions all reached highly significant levels (p < 0.01).
Differences were considered to be significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.01.
Highly significant differences were noted for CD62L, LAP, IL-10, CTLA-4, HLA-DR, GARP, Helios (p<0.01) and for ICOS, CD39, CCR7(p<0.05).
In contrast, there was a marked and highly significant ( p <0.01) reduction in Y705 phosphorylated STAT3 by OLT1177 (82%) and AZD1480 (80%) compared to vehicle ( Figures 2C, D ).
Meta-analysis showed that maternal circulating sHLA-G concentration was not significantly associated with RIF (SMD -0.81, 95%CI -2.84~-1.21, p-value=0.432) with extremely significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 95.4%, p-value<0.01) ( Figure 6 and Supplementary Table 6 ).
Analysis of variance showed highly significant differences (p < 0.01) in IL-6 and TNF-a compared to the model group in all nine groups with different dose combinations of high, medium and low.
At 30 min after the injection of bacteria treated with CTLD, an extremely significant decrease in the number of bacteria ( P < 0.01) in crabs was observed compared with that in control crabs ( Figure 5 ).
Differences were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05 and highly significant if p <0.01, p <0.001, p <0.0001, marked in the figures with *, **, *** and **** respectively.
The gut antioxidant parameters of wild and cultured Amur grayling showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.01).