Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,862 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp -value ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Within both SAM-H1/CNE and aMIV groups, Tbet expression was generally higher in Cd62l- pent+CD8+ T cells compared to their Cd62l+ counterpart, with differences being highly significant at early time points after immunization ( Figure 5A , D10p1 and D10P2; adjusted Fisher’s exact test p -value ≤ 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results showed that 14 proteins were highly related to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 12 proteins were further screened with highly significant levels (p < 0.001) that were closely related to hospitalization outcomes; among them, the proteins ADM, IL-6, MCP-3, TRAIL-R2, and PD-L1 can be used as predictors of death.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
After excluding outliers exceeding 3 standard deviations (14 T1DM samples with S1P > 2315.3 nmol/L and 9 HC samples with S1P > 761.8 nmol/L), the difference remained highly significant (606.7 ± 431.8 vs. 390.8 ± 160.5 nmol/L, P < 0.001; Table 3 ), confirming that the elevation was not driven by extreme values.
highly significantp = 0.00140.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The weighted average of this correlation across all psoriasis datasets was highly significant, [r s = 0.31 (0.12, 0.51); p = 0.0014], with no evidence (p = 0.33) of any substantial residual heterogeneity (i.e., there was no remaining variability in effect sizes that was unexplained) ( Figure 3B ).
highly significantp = 0.001450.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The cervix, characterized by extremely low richness and evenness, differed markedly from neonatal placental samples, which exhibited higher but heterogeneous alpha-diversity; all indices were highly significant in both cohorts (Chao1 p = 0.00145 in LP; p = 0.000923 in TP; Shannon p = 0.00031 in LP and p = 0.000931 in TP) ( Figures 4 , 5 ).
nominally significantp=0.001750.0× alphagold
In addition, because CD4T and CD8T showed nominally significant associations with hsCRP, we also tested these interactions in chronic pain and found that CD4T, but not CD8T, positively interacted with hsCRP (beta=2.5, p=0.00175; n=820; Figure 1E ) in chronic pain.
a positive trendp=0.0020.0× alphagold
These variables were entered into the multivariate logistic regression model, which showed that individuals aged 70 years or older had a significantly higher likelihood of being within the molecular transmission network compared to those aged under 25 years (OR = 2.17, 95% CI:1.02-4.62), with a positive trend observed across increasing age groups (trend χ2=9.695, p=0.002).
highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The correlation analysis indicated a highly significant negative correlation between GBP2 and P2RY12 (cor = -0.641, p = 0.002), while a significant positive correlation was observed between GBP2 and PSAP (cor = 0.660, p = 0.002) ( Figure 4D ; Supplementary Table S3 ).
marginally significantP = 0.0020.0× alphagold
We detected a significant excess of variants in two of the pathways in CVID patients when compared to controls: Fc epsilon RI signaling and cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction pathways ( P < 0.001 and 0.002, respectively), plus two other marginally significant pathways after applying multiple test correction: cytosolic-DNA sensing, and NFKB signaling ( P = 0.002 and 0.001, respectively).
highly significantp=0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Two-way repeated measures ANOVA analysis revealed a highly significant increase in total plasma cell frequency ( Figure 1F ) associated with both IL-21 treatment (p=0.002, F=14.1) and KSHV infection (p=0.002, F=14.4) with a significant interaction of the two variables (p=0.001, F=17.8), indicating that KSHV and IL-21 synergistically increase total plasma cell numbers in our ex vivo cultures ( Figure 1G ).
highly significantp = 0.00250.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In sharp contrast, CADA nearly completely blocked the upregulation of 4‐1BB in all samples (89 ± 4% and 79 ± 3% reduction in MFI for CD3/CD8 and PHA, respectively), which was highly significant (p = 0.0025 and 0.0011, respectively; paired t-test).