Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.01.
Excerpts
However, compared to the MOD group, there were highly significant differences in the spleen and thymus index of the M-POP-1 and H-POP-1 groups ( p < 0.01).
The regression model is highly significant ( p < 0.01), with a non-significant lack of fit, indicating the reasonableness of the regression model and its good fit.
However, the storage period had a highly significant effect ( p < 0.01) on RR.
The results are expressed as ‘mean ± standard error’, where a single asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference at p < 0.05, while a double asterisk (**) signifies a highly significant difference at p < 0.01 [ 38 ]. 3.
Highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) were observed in yellowness (b*) values for storage days 60 and 90.
The use of different letters such as “a” and “b” indicates significant differences at the p < 0.05 level; “**” indicates extremely significant difference at the p < 0.01 level, “*” indicates significant difference at the p < 0.05 level, and “ns” indicates no significant difference between the two groups. 3.
Apart from neophytadiene, there was a highly significant ( p < 0.01) or significant ( p < 0.05) negative correlation between the DPPH radical scavenging ability (IC50 value) and the content of five terpenoid compounds.
The interaction between factors A and C was highly significant ( p < 0.01).
On the one hand, the ANOVA ( Table 2 ) showed that the RDF-PR factor had a significant ( p < 0.05) linear effect on L* and h° and a highly significant ( p < 0.01) quadratic effect on a*, b*, C, and h°.
In the CK group, anthocyanin content exhibited a highly significant and positive correlation with VvLDOX expression ( p < 0.01).
The linear A coefficient was highly significant ( p < 0.01) on TAFs’ yield, while the quadratic coefficient B 2 was significant ( p < 0.05) on TAFs yield, suggesting that the parameter of liquid–solid ratio (A) and ultrasonic temperature (C) were the two primary factors affecting the extraction yield, and the primary impact relationships of each factor were: liquid–solid ratio > ultrasonic temperature > water content in DES.
However, the protease had a highly significant impact on it ( p < 0.01).
The models for both response indicators were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.01), indicating the efficacy of the model.
However, the DPPH-RSA showed a highly significant negative correlation with the TPC ( p < 0.01), and negatively correlated with other items.
Moreover, as shown in Table 12 , after 12 days of storage at 25 °C, the CFI and moisture contents were significantly positively correlated with the hardness, springiness, and resilience of alkali-induced EWG ( p < 0.01) and significantly positively correlated with the chewiness ( p < 0.05), while the TVB-N contents showed a highly significant negative correlation with hardness, springiness, resilience, and chewiness ( p < 0.01).
The quadratic model of the regression model was highly significant ( p < 0.01), indicating that the model was a good fit for the experiment within the experimental range, with a moderate model choice and high reliability of the experimental results.
With increasing slope on the AB and AD surfaces, the interactive effect was highly significant ( p < 0.01), the AC interactive effect was significant ( p < 0.05), and the BC , BD , and CD interactive effect were not significant ( p > 0.05).
The C item was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), and the quadratic item (A 2 , B 2 , C 2 , D 2 ) showed a significant level ( p < 0.01).
A highly significant correlation was found also between gumminess and resilience influenced by G′, G′′, G*, and complex viscosity (r = 0.76 to 0.9, p > 0.01).
In addition, as fluctuation in the temperature of the storage environment increased, the correlation between some indicators was enhanced, for example, the correlation between ADP and some indicators (such as EL, MDA, O 2 · − , H 2 O 2 , etc.) changed from significant ( p < 0.05) to extremely significant ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 8 A–C).
Compared with those of the M group, the TNF-α and IL-6 levels showed an extremely significant decrease in both the CYP-treated group and the SCYP-treated group ( p < 0.01).
However, the results of the significance analysis marked with letters a, b, and c indicate that there is a highly significant difference in orientation among beef jerky, pork jerky, and chicken jerky samples ( p < 0.01).
As shown in Table S3 , the analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated that the model was highly significant ( F -value = 79.54, p < 0.01).
Furthermore, the correlation between the polyphenol content of PSO and the DHHP value (0.824) and ABTS value (0.810) was highly significant ( p -value < 0.01) ( Table 3 ).