Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,234 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp ≤ 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
In ‘Surkh’, storage interval had a highly significant effect on chilling injury ( p ≤ 0.01), and TG-coated fruit consistently exhibited lower injury; at 20 days of cold storage plus 2 days at 20 °C ± 1 °C, TG-treated fruit recorded an injury score of 3.4 compared with 4.0 in the control ( Figure 2 B).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, the interactive effects of phenolic extract concentration-drying temperature and phenolic extract concentration-feed flow rate were significant ( p < 0.05); and the interaction between drying temperature and feed flow rate was highly significant ( p < 0.01).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Combined with the results of the correlation analysis in Table 2 , the amount of yeast added had a significant effect on the three factors of total sugar, vitamin C, and flavonoids in the wine samples, with highly significant negative correlations with total sugar ( p < 0.01), significant positive correlations with vitamin C ( p < 0.05), and highly significant positive correlations with flavonoids ( p < 0.01). 3.7.
extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
In addition, as fluctuation in the temperature of the storage environment increased, the correlation between some indicators was enhanced, for example, the correlation between ADP and some indicators (such as EL, MDA, O 2 · − , H 2 O 2 , etc.) changed from significant ( p < 0.05) to extremely significant ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 8 A–C).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
In LCHN, the moisture content of boluses showed a highly significant positive correlation with the amount of saliva added (r = 1.000) and saliva flow rate (r = 0.961) ( p < 0.01), indicating that the moisture content of boluses affects the amount of saliva added and saliva flow rate, and both the amount of saliva added and saliva flow rate increase with an increase in the moisture content of boluses.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
A more detailed comparison revealed that the group treated with n -butanol was 32.81%, 47.67%, and 29.25% lower than that of the control group at d 7, 14, and 35 d of storage, respectively, which was highly significant ( p < 0.01), and Figure 8 b shows that the level of expression of CmPLD-β in the group treated with n -butanol was lower than that in the control group at the selected storage time points, which was consistent with the PLD activity ( Figure 8 a).