In the construction of the final model (AIC = 154.2), it was found that the type of urban planning is relevant to explain the abundance of rabbits, obtaining a highly significant model (F 6,29 = 6.05; p = 0.0003) that explains somewhat over 46% of the variability observed in the data (adjusted R 2 = 0.464).
Excerpts
However, when the data summarized from all three farms were aggregated, a highly significant positive correlation was observed between BRV positivity and mortality ( p = 0.0003, ρ = 0.8642).
1.31 ± 0.99 mg/mL, respectively; p = 0.1016), with a highly significant increase on day 3 taking into consideration the baseline status ( p = 0.0004) ( Table 2 ).
The NC group also had significantly higher cumulative lameness incidence than all treatment groups, with highly significant comparisons to T3 ( p < 0.0004 ), T4 ( p = 0.0014 ), and T5 ( p < 0.0001 ).
The difference was highly significant (Fisher’s Exact Test, p = 0.0005).
Among them, extremely significant differences were present in the body weight traits in adult SWCG ( p = 0.0006).
There was highly significant interaction between dietary treatment and storage time for a* ( p = 0.0007) and chroma ( p = 0.0472).
The difference in diversity was highly significant (t = 3.34, df = 501.72, p = 0.0009).
Spatial Differences Among Plantations A Chi-square test of independence revealed highly significant differences in the proportion of damaged boxes among plantations (χ 2 = 201.3, df = 4, p < 0.001).
Under the AR1 structure, the time effect was highly significant (F(6, 108) = 314.26, p < 0.001), confirming the expected progressive weight gain over the experimental period.
The interactions between tannin type and concentration (T × C) and tannin type and water level (T × W) were both highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all the analyzed variables except for dCP_BP ( p = 0.157), while the interaction between tannin concentrations and water level (C × W) was insignificant in all variables.
This difference was very highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The mean (±standard deviation SD]) COX-2 expression values were 26.25 (SD, ±24.46) and 125.6 (SD, ±58.34) for non-FISS and FISS, respectively, corresponding to a highly significant ( p = 0.001) difference between them ( Figure 2 ). 3.4.
This analysis revealed highly significant main effects of tissue for all seven genes (all p < 0.001), indicating strong tissue specificity ( Supplementary Table S11 ).
Probiotic supplementation had a highly significant linear effect ( p < 0.001) on villus height.
The significant level of datum was declared at p < 0.05, and the extremely significant level of datum was declared at p < 0.001.
ANOVA results for the response surface data ( Table 2 ) revealed that the regression model was highly significant ( p < 0.001) and exhibited a non-significant lack-of-fit term ( p = 0.578).
Sperm Motility in Sexed Porcine Semen The quantitative assessment of Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) parameters demonstrates a highly significant discriminatory impact ( p < 0.001) of the sexing process on the kinematic integrity of porcine spermatozoa, revealing a clear disparity between X- and Y-enriched populations ( Table 4 ).
Similarly, lamb birth weight was highly significant for perinatal mortality in the univariable analyses ( p < 0.001), and the current mode of delivery also showed significance (0.018), with lower odds of survival for lighter lambs and lambs born through vaginal delivery.
For the enterocyte area, the main effect of the apelin reached significance ( p = 0.019), while all other interaction and segment effects were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The one-way ANOVA model confirmed highly significant between-group variation (F = 28.7, p < 0.001), with the transitional phase accounting for 63% of the total variance.
The results demonstrated a highly significant baseline difference in waterbird composition between the impact and control lakes (Treatment effect: F 1,14 = 8.071, p = 0.001), reflecting inherent habitat variations.
Furthermore, the mean Mg:Ca ratio at otolith edge varied significantly among months ( p ≤ 0.05), with significant differences between May and June ( p ≤ 0.05), and highly significant differences between May and September ( p ≤ 0.001), while June and July did not differ significantly ( p > 0.05).
Salinity showed highly significant effects on SGR D in both winter and spring (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001, p = 0.006, respectively).
As shown in Table 2 , during the simulated gastric intestinal continuous digestion process, the protein hydrolysis degree (DH) of different protein sources showed extremely significant differences in both digestion stages ( p < 0.001).