Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,473 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The AMOVA analysis ( Table 3 ), based on the SAMOVA grouping, showed significant genetic differences mainly between groups when the 30 populations were divided into two, three, four, and five groups (50.47%, 63.63%, 74.85%, 84.52%), with highly significant genetic differentiation coefficients ( p < 0.01).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant difference in the unit density of red muntjac at different moving speeds (F = 1.579, df = 2, p < 0.01), there was no significant difference in the unit density of Gongshan muntjac at different moving speeds (F = 1.1105, df = 2, p > 0.05), and there was a highly significant difference in the unit density of Fea’s muntjacs at different moving speeds (F = 0.5129, df = 2, p < 0.01).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Similarly, the g.-2030T>C mutation was significantly associated with the body weight, body height, body length, chest depth, and cannon circumference in GSFW ewes, and all these traits showed that the growth trait indicators of mutant individuals were highly significant compared to wild-type individuals ( p < 0.01) ( Table 3 ).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The final body weight, WGR, SGR and PER showed highly significant negative linear ( p < 0.01) and quadratic ( p < 0.01) relationships with dietary MDA content; thereinto, the final body weight, WGR and PER were significantly lower in the M8 and M16 groups compared to the M0 and M1 groups, and the SGR was significantly lower in the M16 group compared to the M0 and M1 groups ( p < 0.05).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
However, for carbon stable isotopes, the difference between the EH-GLG and XXL-LS populations reached a highly significant level ( p < 0.01); at the same time, the δ 13 C values of the hairs from the XXL-LS was different from the QL population ( p < 0.05), while the disparity of GLG and QL populations was not evident ( p > 0.05) in carbon isotopes ( Figure 3 a).