In the results, different capital letters indicate highly significant differences ( p < 0.01), different lowercase letters indicate significant differences ( p < 0.05), and the same letter indicates non-significant differences ( p > 0.05) within the same line. 3.
Excerpts
The t -test showed an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) between the two groups ( Table 1 ).
(3) Western blot results showed that the protein expression of neural tissue development and cognitive-related genes (DCX and BDNF) in the hippocampal tissues of the IM group was significantly higher ( p < 0.05), and the protein expression of EGR1 was highly significant ( p < 0.01), compared with the CM group.
The difference in weight between the male and female populations was also extremely significant ( p < 0.01). 3.5.
The highest expression of miR-30a-3p was found in the lung, which was highly significant compared to the other tissues ( p < 0.01).
Significance was determined for highly significant differences at p ≤ 0.01 (A and B) and for significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 (a and b). 3.
In this study, statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05, with highly significant results at p < 0.01, and trends were noted when 0.05 < p ≤ 0.1. 3.
The Solobacterium showed a highly significant positive correlation with LDL ( p < 0.01).
Trends ( p < 0.1), significant ( p < 0.05) and highly significant associations ( p < 0.01) of sample source or farm housing and management factors are displayed for feed (Table 3), feed equipment (Table 4) and bedding (Table 5).
Data were considered statistically significant for p < 0.05 and highly significant for p < 0.01.
The difference reached statistical significance when compared with CK20 ( p < 0.05) and was highly significant in comparison with C and CK15 ( p < 0.01).
Meanwhile, POPC upregulated antioxidant-related genes, including SIRT1, SIRT2, SOD1, and SOD2 (with SIRT1 and SOD1 showing highly significant differences, p < 0.01).
There was highly significant attenuation ( p < 0.01) in the abundance of the Enterorhabdus and Alistipes bacterial groups caused by Salmonella , but the abundance of the Lactobacillus and Candidatus_Saccharimonas bacterial groups still significantly increased ( p < 0.01).
In RStudio, the t -test was used to check whether there was a significant difference (significant: p < 0.05; extremely significant: p < 0.01) [ 29 ].
Least Squares Analysis of Birth Weight in Yunnan Semi-Fine Wool Sheep As shown in Table 3 , the birth year, sex, lambing date, flock, litter size, and dam age all had highly significant effects on the Birth Weight ( p < 0.01).
At g.18202372 G>A, AA individuals showed a highly significant increase in mean litter size compared with GG individuals ( p < 0.01).
Within these trials, for Canton-S, most movement parameters were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.010) with the non-significant exceptions including DCR ( p = 0.349), MC ( p ≤ 0.081), and I -index ( p ≤ 0.073) for micro-areas ( Table 1 a).
At the genus level, Bacteroides showed extremely significant differences in the large intestine and the small intestine ( p < 0.01), Citrobacter showed significant differences in the large intestine and the small intestine ( p < 0.05), and Clostridium showed significant differences in the large intestine and the small intestine ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 4 C).
Compared to the control group, the experimental group exhibited a significant decrease in trypsin activity ( p < 0.05) and a highly significant decrease in amylase activity ( p < 0.01).
Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.01.
Statistical significance was indicated by the following symbols: * for a significant difference ( p < 0.05), ** for a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01), and *** for an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.001).
Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05, highly significant differences were indicated by p < 0.01, and p > 0.05 was considered as no significant difference. 3.
The results indicated that amphioxus abundance exhibited a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.01) with 18 environmental factors, encompassing sediment organic carbon, sulfides, petroleum hydrocarbons, different particle size fractions (1~0.5 mm, 0.5~0.25 mm, 1~0.25 mm, 0.125~0.063 mm and <0.001 mm), sand content, silt content, clay content, as well as water quality parameters such as water depth, chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrite, nitrate, inorganic nitrogen, chlorophyll-a and transparency ( Table 1 ).
Additionally, lauric acid (C12:0) and myristic acid (C14:0) demonstrated highly significant increases ( p < 0.01).
Differences in milk yield, milk fat percentage, and lactose percentage were highly significant ( p < 0.01) across Groups A, B, C, and D.