borderline significancep = 0.070
In contrast, HALP at day +100 maintained and strengthened its association with PFS after adjustment (HR: 3.27, 95% CI: 1.45–7.38; p = 0.004), as did ΔHALP at borderline significance (HR: 1.97; p = 0.070).
In contrast, HALP at day +100 maintained and strengthened its association with PFS after adjustment (HR: 3.27, 95% CI: 1.45–7.38; p = 0.004), as did ΔHALP at borderline significance (HR: 1.97; p = 0.070).
In contrast, for OS, no HALP-based cut-off demonstrated a statistically robust association, with only a borderline non-significant result observed for HALP at diagnosis ( p = 0.083), while the remaining HALP-based cut-offs were not significant ( Table 3 ).