borderline significancep = 0.05
Retinal vascular analysis showed reduced SRVD in the fovea with borderline significance (14.9 ± 7.1% vs. 17.9 ± 7.4%; p = 0.05), while DRVD showed a non-significant reduction (31.4 ± 10.1% vs. 37.8 ± 24.0%; p > 0.05).
Retinal vascular analysis showed reduced SRVD in the fovea with borderline significance (14.9 ± 7.1% vs. 17.9 ± 7.4%; p = 0.05), while DRVD showed a non-significant reduction (31.4 ± 10.1% vs. 37.8 ± 24.0%; p > 0.05).
The foveal SRVD demonstrated a borderline significant reduction in HM eyes (14.9 ± 7.1% vs. 17.9 ± 7.4%; p = 0.05), while more pronounced decreases were observed in both the parafovea (43.2 ± 6.4% vs. 48.1 ± 5.6%; p < 0.01) and perifovea (45.0 ± 5.0% vs. 48.1 ± 4.2%; p < 0.01) regions ( Figure 3 ).
53.9 ± 9.2 μm), this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.09) ( Figure 2 ).