“weakly significant”

However, it was weakly significant at 10% level among the urban women (OR = 1.440 , CI = 1.036–2.002).

We used the GEPIA2 website to determine a weakly significant association between YAP1, TAZ, and the CAF marker α-SMA (ACTA2), which was subsequently verified by qPCR.

In contrast, the coefficient for low-marketization cities is 0.113, which is positive but only weakly significant.

CONCLUSIONS: Weakly significant correlation between mild malocclusion and dental self-esteem.

The chosen amount also has a positive and weakly significant correlation with confidence in the officially-provided information and a positive though not statistically significant association with trust in government.

Surgery (mastectomy vs quadrantectomy) ( P = 0.046, OR 2.55 [95% CI 1–6.44]) was weakly significant for RINV. t -test also confirmed the significant correlation of RINV with Dmax and Dmean to GEJCPs; the irradiated breast side and PTV volume were also statistically significant.

Population density was weakly significant.

Instead, a smaller, separate group of ICH genes were found to have weakly significant associations with CD163 + cell densities.

However, in a previous study that investigated the same population in 2007, there was a negligible or weakly significant relationship between PUT experience and depressive symptoms [ 4 ].

However, exceptions were observed with treatments at 10 μg/L, 10 μg/L + B1, 20 μg/L, and 20 μg/L + B1, which displayed a weakly significant interaction (Fig. 4 a).

CAPP1 revealed a weakly significant effect of aspirin on size of largest observed polyp and a significant reduction in crypt length in participants given resistant starch. 2 In CAPP2 over 6 years, 937 people from 43 international centres commenced intervention. 3 After intervention, mean 29 months, there was no evidence that either a

Likewise, the weakly significant association we observed between estradiol levels in post-menopausal women and SNP rs2630488 of GNRHR derived from a single subgroup in one cohort, and is also likely to reflect chance.

Results at p < 0.01 were considered highly significant and, if the value ranged between 0.05 and 0.1 ( 20 – 26 ), weakly significant.