“weakly significant”

For amo A-NP-gamma-2.2 and -delta, the difference in median was weakly significant (Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test, p = 0.015 and 0.024 respectively).

We observed a weakly significant upregulation in ahr2 (log2FC = 1.140; p = 0.015; FDR = 0.161).

burgdorferi , the IR peptides showed weakly significant differences in antigenicity among the antigens ( P = 0.0159 by ANOVA), with only VlsE showing a significant difference from the BSA control ( P = 2.9e−3 by ANOVA) ( Fig. 5B , middle).

Weakly significant positive correlations were also found between the FIB-4 index and LSM ( ρ = 0.231, P = 0.016), between the APRI and LSM ( ρ = 0.206, P = 0.032), and between the LSM and CAP ( ρ = 0.262, P = 0.006).

Therefore, even if the HLA-B40 antigen remained weakly significant after correction for multiple-testing, the alleles lost statistical significance (P = 0.016, Pc = 0.24).

As for hospital characteristics, there were weakly significant differences in bed number (p=0.016) and CSC score in 2010 (p=0.032) between the two groups on univariable analysis ( table 3 ).

32 The current study found a weakly significant correlation (ρ=0.242, P=0.016) between the PBH levels of mothers and those of their postnatal umbilical cord, with a mean value of (67.36±16.70 (mg/dL).

Gender differences in the perceived importance of training were weakly significant (r s = 0.119, P = 0 .017), with female pharmacists slightly more likely to value such training.

We found that marriage was associated with a better adjusted HR than any other marital status in all four regions (all P < 0.05; in some of the comparisons, P < 0.001), although in the North Central region, married patients have only a weakly significant advantage over divorced/separated and widowed patients ( P = 0.017 or 0.016, respectively) (Figure 5 , Table 10 ).

Bodyweight was positively associated with incisor length (Coef = 0.036, SE = 0.013; P = 0.006), while the quadratic term for BCS was also weakly significant (Coef = –0.554, SE = 0.232; P = 0.017).

The correlation between OTU richness and latitude was weakly significant ( r = -0.3614, P = 0.0173) ( Figure 3 ).

We found that the saliva data did not correlate well with the blood Pb results; the first saliva sample showed no significant correlation, but the second saliva sample did show a weakly significant correlation (for 61 paired samples when Pb blood vs Pb ‘Saliva sample 2’ p = 0.0177).

However, the classical TIL marker CD8A alone did not differ between cancer and benign lesions and only weakly significant differences were observed between LumA and ER‐negative cancers ( P = 0.018, non‐Bonferroni‐corrected P ‐value).

For Hmax, by contrast, both age ( P < 0.001) and sex ( P = 0.005) were correlated with residuals, and Hmin also showed weakly significant partial correlations for age ( P = 0.018) and sex ( P = 0.12) ( Table 6 ).

RMSSD showed minimal associations with Motion metrics ( n = 90), with only one weakly significant correlation (Speed Max: ρ = −0.243, β = −0.178, p = 0.019) and six non-significant correlations (all p > 0.05).

Cooperativeness was a negative and weakly significant correlate with Legal Problems (r=−0.173; p=0.019).

It was also determined that as maternal age at birth increased, the total breastfeeding time was longer, and a weakly significant relationship was observed (p=0.019).

The TOS values in GCF showed only a weakly significant covariation in the whole group of patients with periodontitis, with mean CAL on the interproximal surfaces from regions with 3-mm loss at least ( R = 0.323; p = 0.019).

If AK01 was excluded from the analysis the association between geographic and genetic distance was weakly significant ( r = 0.5, p = 0.02) (Additional file 1 : Figure S3).

For all canals, we found little decrease in VOR gain with age, at least up to the 80s, such that the factor Age was not significant for horizontal and anterior canals and Age was only weakly significant ( p < 0.02) for the posterior canal.

Platelet magnesium ATPase activity, however, showed an increased activity in the control group (non-hypertensive, normoglycaemic), which was weakly significant when compared against two of the three hypertensive groups (NG: p = 0.02 and IGT: = p 0.001 but not the DM group).

The difference EEAS noise–quiet scores showed a weak but significant relationship with ear asymmetry (β = −0.11) and HA experience (β = 0.12), in a weakly significant model (F(3,433) = 3.3, p <.02 , r = 0.15).

However, we did observe a weakly significant anoxic response among shared families ( p = 0.02, chi-squared test; Supplementary Figure S2D ) and a strongly consistent anoxic response for shared OTUs ( Figure 4 ).

Also the green cluster tends to have slightly larger γ values, but this increase is just weakly significant (p=0.02).

There were weakly significant decreases from baseline of glycerophosphocholine for both the FO (log 2 FC -0.12 ± 0.05; P = 0.02) and FO+MCT (log 2 FC -0.18 ± 0.07; P = 0.02) groups.