Barely Significant
← all phrases

“weakly significant”

1,388 sentences · 1,388 papers · 1,784 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.11

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

weakly significantqualifiedgold
According to the standardized parallel-connection model used to evaluate the relationships and the effect size of an observed factor considering trigger factors, SAR values range from 0 to 0.24 for low effect sizes or weakly significant factors (which could be understood as one of more four factors that may play a role in disease incidence under the standard model), from 0.25 to 0.49 for medium effect sizes (which imply that one of two or three factors may play a role in disease incidence), and over 0.50 for high effect sizes (which imply that mainly one factor plays a role in disease incidence).
weakly significantqualifiedgold
This analysis provides more robust support for purifying selection than classical tests based on the ratio of synonymous to non-synonymous mutations (which are weakly significant for EBLN-1 [11] ), strongly indicating that EBLN-1 has been exapted in the primate genome, at least during part of its evolutionary history.
Endogenous viral elements in animal genomes.
PLoS Genet · 2010 · PMC2987831
weakly significantqualifiedgold
Results Weak HLA class II association with DRB1*01:01~DQA1*01:01~DQB1*05:01 in anti-NMDAR encephalitis Using the largest sample possible (imputed HLA ), controlling for ethnicity/PC (within each ethnic group) and conducting a meta-analysis, a complex HLA association pattern was revealed, with multiple weakly significant HLA class II allele associations.
weakly significantqualifiedgold
Despite the greater difficulty in learning this task, mice still showed only a very weakly significant performance decline immediately following a columnar-scale lesion in vS1, which recovered by the next day (performance before lesion, 73.9 ± 2.2%; performance after lesion, 69.8 ± 2.5%; p = 0.039; n = 7; performance on second post lesion day, 77.7 ± 1.4%, p = 0.080, n = 7; Fig. 8 C ).