Considering net transfers, the two treatments that allow for exclusion do not generate significantly different net transfers as compared to Prop for period 6 (effect size for WA vs Prop is − 6.8%, p -value = 0.27 and effect size for LN vs Prop is, 5.9%, p -value = 0.41), and the comparison between net transfers for WA and LN is weakly significant ( p -value = 0.11).
← all phrases
“weakly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.11
In the literature
While the CVs in arterial regions were significantly greater than the CVs in venous regions in the stabilized use case ( P < 0.05), the difference in the CVs in the two types of vessels during the handheld use case was only weakly significant ( P < 0.11).
At the group level, only the associations for the control group tended to be weakly significant and negative for self-efficacy ( p = 0.111) as well as for knowledge and skills ( p = 0.078).
However loads peaked 2 dpi at significantly higher levels in male nasal swabs compared with female (mean log 10 7.16 vs 6.44 gRNA IU/mL, respectively (Mann–Whitney rank sum test, p = 0.013), though only weakly significant 4dpi (one-tailed t-test, p = 0.114).
In the present study, on the results of univariable analysis (Supplementary Table S1) its association with anthrax was weakly significant ( P = 0.131), qualifying the variable to be entered into the multivariable analysis.
Figure S1 illustrates the muscles for which this attenuation was significant ( p < 0.05) or weakly significant (0.05 < p < 0.15).
There were increased odds of cases developing tHUS in the spring season (March to May) which was weakly significant (p=0.151), although this peak was only observed in 2009.
Interestingly, a statistically significant difference in GN was also discovered between Siemens Protocols 1 and 2 ( p = 0.026); however, this difference is only weakly significant ( p = 0.156) when the Bonferroni correction for multiple hypothesis testing is applied.
Positional conservation is also observed at ~-1300, -1700 (4, 6 occurrences, respectively) and at ~-400 (6 occurrences; interesting but statistically weakly significant, p < 0.22).
It was determined that there was a negative and weakly significant relationship between “Prenatal Attachment Inventory” and “Wijma Birth Expectation/Experience Scale/Version A” scores of pregnant women (r=-0.11 and p=0.23).
The same trend was not observed for bacteria – inoculation treatment only had a weakly significant effect on the community composition of bacteria (multivariate PERMANOVA, F 3,52 = 0.100, p = 0.47, R 2 = 0.054) ( Fig 6B ).
Regarding the meta-regression model, sex was a weakly significant moderator ( p = 0.496), with no differences between studies that included exclusively male or female subjects, and a lower estimate for studies that included both (0.3920 ± 0.1220, 95% CI: 0.1529 to 0.6311, 95% PI: −0.5572 to 1.3412).
had a weakly significant ( P = 0.91) negative association (posterior probability) with Antrodia infirma , and Tympanis spp. had a strongly significant ( P = 0.99) positive association with the establishment of Anthoporia albobrunnea .
While in our data no correlation between miR-133b levels and SNCA expression was detectable ( Table 3 ), a negatively correlated association of miR-133b to TH expression was weakly significant for PD samples ( Table 3 ).
The original feature set is divided into three categories: nonsignificant, weakly significant, and significant features, based on the normalized independent classification information (NICI).
Dominance effects were weakly significant only for height growth under the ABLUP model, and for height, DBH, volume, and acoustic velocity under the GBLUP model.
The results confirmed those of the discriminant analysis, showing minimal (weakly significant) discrimination between outlines.
A p value < 0.01 was considered significant and p < 0.05 was considered weakly significant.
Other spendings on child education—schoolbooks and supplies, tutoring services, afterschool programs, and recreational goods, etc.—are insignificant or weakly significant mediators in the association between CTC and GAD.
However, in the long term, it exhibits a weakly significant negative impact on the ecological footprint.
While in the large study no association between MA and biochemical variables was revealed in non-overweight subjects [ 10 ], in the smaller study a weakly significant direct relationship between UAE rate and fasting insulinemia, and surprisingly an inverse relationship to hsCRP was revealed in non-diabetic adolescents [ 22 ].
The PHYC by Latitude interaction term was very significant for ±V (SD), and weakly significant for ±V (LD) and VERN.
Carbamazepine-primed T-cells displayed a weakly significant proliferative response when restimulated at the highest concentration of 200 μM.
Moreover, as seen above, coefficients on this variable are weakly significant in all countries except the United Kingdom.
The SPADI score and ROM showed moderate and significant correlations in scaption and abduction and a weakly significant correlation in external rotation.