Barely Significant
← all phrases

“trending towards significance”

516 sentences · 516 papers · 646 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>0.15

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

trending towards significancep=.081.6× alphagold
Results: There were no significant differences in cytokine concentration between the 96-hr control group and the BMAC co-culture for any cytokine, although IL-6 was trending towards significance (Control: 856.3 ± 346.2 vs BMAC: 662.3 ± 346.8, p=.08).
trending towards significancep = .081.6× alphagold
Group differences revealed that within the dACC region, an arousal × congruence effect existed, trending towards significance in the SZ group ( t (39.24) = 2.023, p = .08) whereas the HC group resulted otherwise( t (39.23) = 0.32, p = .35).
trending towards significancep = 0.081.6× alphagold
Interestingly, the interaction of distance and treatment group was trending towards significance; given the sample size, it is unclear whether there is a true lack of an interaction effect or if this is due to the sample size (F(7.29, 38.88) = 2.00; p = 0.08).
trending towards significancep = 0.081.6× alphagold
For the trained leg, there was an increase of around 15% from M1 to M2 for the FE group (β = 1.32 (0.72)), but the change over time in comparison to the control group was only trending towards significance (t(50) = 1.81, p = 0.08) and only became significant at M3 (β = 1.80 (0.72)) (t(50) = 2.49, p = 0.02).
trending towards significancep = 0.081.6× alphagold
Four other variants were extracted from the GENIE study, which were trending towards significance at the five percent level (rs191101580, rs187087030, rs8060932, rs8062123); one of these (rs8060932; p = 0.08) was shown to be in LD with another SNP, rs4238595 (r 2 = 0.89), associated with FJHN [ 21 ]. rs13333226 has been previously reported to be associated with reduced urinary uromodulin excret
trending towards significancep = 0.081.6× alphagold
However, there was no significant correlation between plasma vitamin C and eGFR ( p = 0.06), and although patients with eGFR < 60 had lower median vitamin C status (17 [11, 34] μmol/L; n = 44) relative to those with eGFR ≥60 (29 [12, 44] μmol/L; n = 92), this was only trending towards significance ( p = 0.08; Figure 3 B).