Barely Significant
← all phrases

“trending towards significance”

516 sentences · 516 papers · 646 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>0.15

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

trending towards significancep = 0.0591.2× alphagold
After the creation of the osteochondral fragment, cfDNA concentrations in SF were significantly higher for OA joints than for sham-operated joints on Days 28 (median 1430 and 631, respectively, p = 0.017) and 63 (median 1537 and 606, respectively, p = 0.021); SF concentrations were trending towards significance for OA joints on Days 35 ( p = 0.059) and 56 ( p = 0.070).
trending towards significancep = 0.061.2× alphagold
For the interaction with people and the environment subdomain (see Table 4 ), while the Step 1 model explained 2.4% of the variance with no significant age, gender, and ALSFRS-R predictors, the Step 2 model showed the overall psychosis score as a significant negative predictor of this QoL subdomain ( β = − 0.32, p = 0.001), with the behaviour score trending towards significance ( β = − 0.18, p = 0.06).
trending towards significanceP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Specifically, stronger inhibitory CPM effect was correlated with lower PAF in the right dlPFC (Spearman r = 0.33, P = 0.04) and sgACC (Pearson r = 0.34, P = 0.03) in the whole group (see Table 3, supplemental digital content, http://links.lww.com/PAIN/C381 ), and similarly stronger inhibitory CPM effect in males was correlated with lower PAF in the right dlPFC (Pearson r = 0.58 P = 0.01) and trending towards significance in the sgACC (Pearson r = 0.47, P = 0.06) (see Fig. 10, supplemental digital content, http://links.lww.com/PAIN/C381 ).
trending towards significancep = 0.061.2× alphagold
c-tDCS group showed comparatively lower improvements than the s-tDCS group in accuracy interference reduction after the intervention trending towards significance (Fig. 6 a), Brunner-Munzel t (41.83) = −1.93, p = 0.06, δ = 0.32 (medium).
trending towards significancep = 0.061.2× alphagold
As shown in Figure 3 c, A2M levels for the elderberry condition at 6 months were significantly higher than baseline [ t (20.00) = −2.73, p = 0.01, g av = 0.78, moderate–large effect], and trending towards significance for higher values than 3 months [ t (20.00) = −1.99, p = 0.06, g av = 0.24, small effect] in post hoc comparisons.