Barely Significant
← all phrases

“trending towards significance”

516 sentences · 516 papers · 646 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>0.15

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

trending towards significancep = 0.0511.0× alphagold
The results showed significant improvement in average pain (Pre: 4.00 ± 2.29; Post: 3.18 ± 2.26; p = 0.007), pain interference with walking ability (Pre: 4.14 ± 3.20; Post: 3.09 ± 1.976; p = 0.03), and standard and cognitive Timed Up-and-Go scores (Pre: 13.75 ± 5.34; Post: 12.65 ± 5.25; p = 0.04; Pre: 15.12 ± 6.60; Post: 12.71 ± 5.57; p = 0.003, respectively); the overall pain improvement was trending towards significance (Pre: 3.48 ± 2.56; Post: 2.87 ± 1.85; p = 0.051).
trending towards significancep = 0.0511.0× alphagold
A relationship between healthcare coverage and current HC use was trending towards significance when smaller benefit groups were considered ( p = 0.051), where those with higher levels of healthcare coverage had higher rates of HC use (provincial and extended health coverage, 31.5%) compared to those with less (provincial coverage only, 26.4%) and no coverage (29.1%).
trending towards significanceP=0.0521.0× alphagold
2C and D includes OS and RFS curves based on the expression of CD133; patients with CD133-positive tumors had a higher risk of mortality that was trending towards significance (P=0.052) and a significantly higher risk of disease recurrence (P=0.023) than CD133-negative patients.
trending towards significancep = 0.0521.0× alphagold
When SUV max was analyzed per single organ, the average measurements between the two scanners were significantly different for bone lesions ( p = 0.03), trending towards significance for lymph nodes ( p = 0.052) and not significant for liver, pancreas, and other sites of disease.
trending towards significancep = .0551.1× alphagold
In summary, CIN during previous CHT proved to be insignificant (p = .110) due to the large variation between instances, younger age proved to be trending towards significance (i.e., occurrence of dCIN tends to decrease with increasing age, p = .055), while the diagnosis showed significant differences. dCIN was significantly higher for GI tumours than for solid (p = .004) and haematological malignancy (p = .010; Table 5 ).