“tendency toward significance”

A tendency toward significance was found in cases with high genomic instability and the occurrence of CTH ( p = 0.0894).

The only tendency toward significance was in the attentional scores of correct responses ( F ( 2,100 ) = 2.39, p = 0.09) and the CON index ( F ( 2,100 ) = 2.37, p = 0.09), implying subtle differences in favor of the vigorous PA group with the highest scores (see Table 1 ). 3.4.

A larger sample size would likely reveal additional significant changes, such as procedure-dependent regulation of Il1b , at least in the DBA/2J strain, in which there currently is a tendency toward significance (mean fold increase at 6 h in mock-treated mice = 2.8; p = 0.09).

Bypass time showed a tendency toward significance in women (OR: 1.012; 95% CI: 0.998–1.027, p = 0.09).

There was a tendency toward significance ( P = 0.09) effect on blood antioxidant capacity when the experimental sheep were fed with OP compared to CS ( Table 7 ).

Only 5% of total quinolone abundances in infant stool resistome were explained by the abundance of quinolone in the milk resistome with a tendency toward significance ( p = 0.091, Figure 8C ).

Removing this subject form the dataset is it possible only to observe a tendency toward significance for the diarrhea frequency during the first week pre-challenge (9.78 and 5.21% of total observations in CTRL and ALGAE, respectively, p < 0.0912).

The analysis of the diet × exercise × concentration interaction showed a tendency toward significance in males ( p = 0.092) but not in females ( p = 0.108).

\end{document} Change in logMAR VA = 0.64 - 0.0083 ± 0.0038 × Age - 0.00070 ± 0.00027 × preoperative CRT ( AICc = 1.2 ) Univariate analyses suggested that SUKIMA was significantly associated with preoperative Mave (r = 0.613, p = 0.00015) and the improvement of Mave (r = 0.470, P = 0.0058), while a tendency toward significance was observed between SUKIMA and postoperative Mave (r = 0.296, P = 0.094; linear regression analysis, Fig. 3 ).

However, only a tendency toward significance was found for this regression model [Full model: F (6, 60) = 1.91; adjusted R 2 = 0.077; p = 0.094].

When the performance of rater 1 and rater 2 was considered, a significant difference for MCI-FTD, MCI-DLB, and MCI-other ( p = 0.002, 0.003, 0.046, respectively), and a tendency toward significance ( p = 0.095) for MCI-other, was found (see Additional file 2 : Figure S2).

There was an association between the PCC-R index and binaural integration ( p =0.001) and a tendency toward significance for the association between the PCC-R index and temporal ordering ( p =0.097).

Differences were reported as significant at P < 0.05; P < 0.01 was considered highly significant and 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10 was designated as a tendency toward significance.

No significant difference was found between groups ( P > 0.05), although there was a tendency toward significance between the control group and the 0.04% CGA group (0.05 < P < 0.10).

In the shoulder condition there was only a tendency toward significance, F (2,27) = 2.81, p <.10, r = 0.41.

Statistical significance was declared at P < 0.05, while a tendency toward significance considered at 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.

Nevertheless, there was a tendency toward significance for p < 0.1.

Differences are reported as significant at p < 0.05; p < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10 was designated as a tendency toward significance. 3.

Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05, and a tendency toward significance considered at 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.

The results in testing the dependency of calving interval on (A) MT and (B) BCS illustrates that the dependency toward temperament cannot be proven significant ( p = 0.8637); however, the dependency toward BCS (F = 2.4897, p = 0.093) and toward both MT and BCS (F = 2.5329, p = 0.0894) had a tendency toward significance, if we consider a threshold at p ≤ 0.10.

Statistical differences were declared at P < 0.05, and a tendency toward significance was considered at 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.

P -values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant ( P < .05), and P -values between 0.05 and 0.1 were considered to indicate a tendency toward significance ( P < .1).

Cyathostomin species frequency of presence was determined by the percentage of horses harboring the species at each given time point and treatment and analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey all-pair comparison method with significance determined at ( p ≤ 0.05) and a tendency toward significance at (0.05 ≤ p ≥ 0.10).

The percentage difference between the supplemented and control groups within each trial was calculated when the comparison was statistically significant ( P < 0.05) or showed a tendency toward significance ( P < 0.10).

The threshold for significance was set at P < 0.05, and the tendency toward significance was set at 0.05 < P < 0.10.