Additionally, in the oblique coronal FS PDWI sequence, the measurements of SbA thickenings on DL-MRI images were higher than those on Conventional-MRI images, with a P value of 0.071, indicating a tendency toward significance.
← all phrases
“tendency toward significance”
In the literature
Statistical differences were declared at p ≤ 0.05, and a tendency toward significance was considered at 0.05 < p ≤ 0.10. 3.
A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, while p -values < 0.1 indicated a tendency toward significance. 3.
Probability values of less than 0.05 ( p < 0.05) were considered significant and the tendency toward significance were considered at 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.1. 3.
Some variables with p-level <0.1 (Harm Avoidance, Perfectionism, Risk behavior) demonstrate a tendency toward significance.
In particular, they failed to demonstrate the previous association of rs1800471 and tendency toward significance of rs1800470 suggesting that although TGFβ1 may be aberrantly expressed at the protein level this may be a result of stimulation from upstream mediators rather than mutations within the gene itself ( 48 ).
A p ‐value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and a p ‐value less than 0.1 was considered to indicate a tendency toward significance, both of which regarded as false discovery rate (FDR) under appropriate contexts.
In the LUAD subgroup (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.30–1.03, P = 0.06), a tendency toward significance was observed.
Findings with a tendency toward significance (approaching the acceptable limit: up to five percentage points above the established alpha value) are highlighted in blue or indicated with a hash symbol (#).
Significance defined as p < 0.05 and 0.05 < p < 0.10 was considered as a tendency toward significance.
In our study in ulcerative colitis children positive relationship between IL-17A with PUCAI and stool calprotectin showed a tendency toward significance.
Differences between treatments with 0.05 < p < 0.10 were considered a tendency toward significance. 3.
As the authors state in the limitation article, due to the small number of cases, in some cases where significant differences were expected, the statistical results only showed a tendency toward significance.
Line 275: Tendency toward significance does not represent statistical significance and therefore should not be discussed as it can lead to over interpretation.
P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference, and P- value between 0.05 and 0.1 was considered to indicate a tendency toward significance.
Lower birth weight ( p = 0.055) indicated a tendency toward significance.