Barely Significant
← all phrases

“slightly significant”

1,754 sentences · 1,754 papers · 2,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06p=0.09

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Based on high (H) or low (L) BAP1 gene expression levels, we investigated the survival difference within these two groups and found that in LGG, HNSC and PRAD, the survival difference between BAP1 high- and low- expression patients was slightly significant (–log­ 10 ( p -value) >1.2) ( Figure 4 A, B).
There is a positive (and slightly significant) result that those who own a farm show higher support for the meat tax relative to those that do not; while this is the opposite of our expectation in terms of cost implication of the tax to farm owners, recent literature finds that rural and urban residents are starting to converge in their support of climate change policies 55 , 56 .
Hemoglobin had the second largest absolute coefficient value in the 7-15-month model–a slightly significant 0.47 (0.02, 0.93)–but the second largest difference in height was predicted by SAP—a child at the 3rd quartile of its distribution predicted to be 0.65 cm shorter than one at the 1st quartile–which also had a highly statistically significant coefficient estimate.
When taking into account the strata, the differences between the nonasymptotic and asymptotic estimators as well as the differences between the observed values and the nonasymptotic estimator were insignificant (Tukey's HSD p ‐value .329 and .113, respectively), while the differences between the observed values and the asymptotic estimator were slightly significant (Tukey's HSD p ‐value .053).
At ambient conditions there was a slightly significant increase both the ES_5FLU and ES_10FLU, this significant change remained at the other testing conditions for the 10% FLU samples but was negated at 37 °C and at the 37 °C submerged conditions for the 5% FLU samples (Fig. 4G ).
Haglind et al [ 57 ] recently reported data from a multicentre prospective controlled non-randomised study including 778 ORP patients and 1,847 RARP patients; according to patients' IIEF-5 scores, a slightly significant advantage in favour of RARP (odds ratio=0.75; 95% confidence interval=0.58~0.96) was seen at a 12-month postoperative assessment after adjusting for confounding variables.
Postprostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction: A Review.
World J Mens Health · 2016 · PMC4999493