Barely Significant
← all phrases

“slightly significant”

1,754 sentences · 1,754 papers · 2,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.06p=0.09

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

slightly significantp = 0.0481.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This difference was slightly significant (exposure: p = 0.048; sham: p = 0.040). 3.3 Chromosomal Maldistribution The mean number of MN+ per 1000 BN did not differ between sham exposure samples and exposure samples for both time groups (2 h: p = 0.894; 24 h: p = 0.212; Figure 5C ).
slightly significantP = 4.9E‐21.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We went on to show that the use of exogenous normalizers only for absolute RT‐qPCR concentrations measurements did not influence the correlation with microarray data (standard normalization) for miR‐16‐5p (r = 0.52; P = 7.1E‐2) and miR‐486‐5p (r = 0.84; P = 2.9E‐4), although the correlation becomes slightly significant for miR‐93‐5p (r = 0.55; P = 4.9E‐2) ( Figure 4 middle panel).
slightly significantp = 0.0491.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The mean BCVA did not differ among study groups at any 3 month interval during the 24-month follow-up, except for at month 6, which showed slightly significant better mean BCVA in the AFB group (0.44 ± 0.34) in comparison to the RNB (0.5 ± 0.38) and RNB to AFB groups (0.5 ± 0.37) ( p = 0.049).
slightly significantp-value = 0.0491.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results showed that rebA exposure could decrease the adsorption of gp17 to its host compared to non-exposed controls: the OD 450 of gp17 exposed to rebA was 2.887 ± 0.090 compared to 3.216 ± 0.184 of gp17 alone, corresponding to a slightly significant decrease of 10.2% (Student’s t-test p-value = 0.049) (Fig. 4 b).
slightly significantp = 0.0491.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A negative significant correlation was observed between TAC concentrations in PBMC and the percentage of gamma-globulins both at the first and second visit (R = 0.393; p = 0.012 and R = −0.482; p = 0.003, respectively): conversely, only a slightly significant correlation was identified between WB TAC concentration at the second visit (R = 0.337; p = 0.049).