“slightly significant”

Slightly significant relationship was found between hatching success and prey C:P ratio (one-way ANOVA, P = 0.042, Table S1 ).

The mean age at enrolment was 65.5 ± 46.3 days, with a slightly significant difference among groups (F = 3.327; p = 0.042).

With regard to the CD8 + T cell count, we were able to detect a slightly significant negative correlation solely between the MRD (w96-BL)/BL and BL CD4 + T cell count ( p = 0.042), but other time-point comparisons did not show any significant association, thus it could be due to chance.

The difference between the two groups was slightly significant ( P = 0.042).

There was a poor but slightly significant correlation between IAP and AP (Fig. 1 ): AP = 1.0357 × IAP + 94.107 ( R 2 = 0.12, P = 0.042), but the bias was considerable.

A slightly significant difference ( p = 0.0425) was observed between T6w/FU and T24w/FU. 3.2.5.

Furthermore, the results of statistical analyses were not so diverse between volumes <9 cm 3 (p = 0.3267, insignificant) and ≥9 cm 3 (p = 0.0429, slightly significant).

There was a slightly significant negative correlation between PRL and monoPRL % (p = 0.043 and r = −0.181).

On the other hand, we found a slightly significant influence of sex on Vitamin D status ( p = 0.043).

AUDIT global scores showed a slightly significant relationship with the results in ASA’s Ability component (rho = 0.083, p = 0.043; Spearman test) and with age (rho = −0.082, p = 0.045; Spearman test) ( Figure 1 B).

In addition, there were no differences reported between non-synergistic and synergistic metabolic scores in PI3Ki–TAKi (Mann–Whitney test p -value = 0.363), but some slightly significant differences were reported between scores in PI3Ki–MEKi ( p -value = 0.043) (see Fig. 4 B).

Comparison of Growth Trajectory and AH Between rhGH-Treated and Untreated NS Subjects The comparison of H measurements between the rhGH treated and untreated NS subjects showed a significant difference between the 2-year-olds groups ( p=0.024 ), the 5-year-olds groups ( p<0.001 ), the pubertal onset groups ( p <0.001 ), and a slightly significant difference between the 10-year-olds groups ( p=0.043 ).

A post-hoc ANOVA revealed that feeding treatment significantly impacted δ 15 N ( P < 0.001), whereas an interaction between time and treatment was slightly significant ( P = 0.043).

The maintenance condition factor exerted a slightly significant effect (p = 0.044) only on the VO 2R of mussels fed the L L diet.

The results showed that, in unstimulated cells, there was a slightly significant downregulation of the mRNA level of SLC9A4 in rs12987977/GG carriers compared with TT carriers ( P = 0.044; Figure 3A ).

The statistical data obtained from ANOVA indicated that TPGS exhibited an agonistic significant effect on the nanoparticle entrapment efficiency ( p = 0.0079), whereas PCL exhibited a slightly significant antagonistic effect ( p = 0.0440).

Meta-analysis showed that the difference in the values of RR was slightly significant in the disease control rate (RR =1.09, 95% CI: 1.00–1.19, P =0.044) ( Figure 4 ).

The COVID-19 period was slightly significant in the descriptive statistics stratified for GOS (Table 2 , p = 0.044); this small difference was, however, no longer evident after excluding the 4 patients who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 ( p = 0.072) and it was not significant in the multivariate logistic model (Table 3 , p = 0.052).

Moreover, when introducing the second block, hedonic balance related to students showed a slightly significant effect ( p = 0.044) on job satisfaction. 3.

MDA showed a slightly significant difference between groups after the study ( p = .044), also, the changes for MDA were not statistically different between groups ( p = .062). 4.

Analysis of the history of bleeding disease showed that there was no difference in the history of digestive tract ulcers among the treatment groups but that there was a slightly significant difference in the history of cerebral hemorrhage ( p = 0.044), which may be related to the number of samples.

Mean shell width is nevertheless slightly larger in males, which is why the differences in the ratio became slightly significant (Wilcoxon test, p = 0.044).

This robust analysis showed a slightly significant interaction between question type and age group ( F 1,44 = 4.2743, p = 0.0446); however, robust post hoc tests on the difference scores (ToM–factual reasoning) did not reveal a significant difference in RT as a function of age group (estimate = 0.2952, p = 0.208). 3.3 .

Since no controls were found to carry this variant, the difference between cases and controls was slightly significant ( P = 0.0450).

Moreover, the relation between the LV diagnosis group and depressive symptoms (CES-D), explored with the Mann–Whitney U test, provided a slightly significant difference ( F (1) = 2.002, p = 0.045), within the median of the AMD and non-AMD diagnosis groups.